[Qgis-user] Error in download webpage?

[Agustin Lobo]

The critical point is better for whom? I understand that it's easier
for administration, which is important as time is scarce. But we
should also consider whether it's better for the users: many of them
do not even know what's stable or unstable in this context.
So we should find a balance. For users, in general, simple pages having 
the fundamental
material and only the fundamental material are the best.

Probably a page as suggested by Otto is a good balance.
In particular putting stable before unstable and source is essential.

Thanks for taking care of the site.

Agus


Tim Sutton wrote:
> Hi
>
> Werner Macho wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> corrected it - if you find more typos - please report ..
>>
>> Speaking from Unstable and Stable .. well probably we should seperate 
>> it - but
>> Source Code IS already on an own page ..
>>
>> I guess it's inside the table to have all things we provide for 
>> download in just one page..
>>
>
> Managing everything in one table is better I think - simplification 
> over complication is good :-) In the table you can just type unstable 
> into the search box to see just unstable packages. You can also sort 
> by columns etc. That should give enough flexibility for those who want 
> it.
>
> Thanks for fixing the typo!
>
> Regards
>
>
>