[Qgis-user] Error in download webpage?
Otto Dassau
otto.dassau at gmx.de
Fri May 15 07:59:34 PDT 2009
Hi,
On Fri, 15 May 2009 11:44:40 +0200
Agustin Lobo <alobolistas at gmail.com> wrote:
> The critical point is better for whom? I understand that it's easier
> for administration, which is important as time is scarce. But we
> should also consider whether it's better for the users: many of them
> do not even know what's stable or unstable in this context.
> So we should find a balance. For users, in general, simple pages having
> the fundamental
> material and only the fundamental material are the best.
>
> Probably a page as suggested by Otto is a good balance.
> In particular putting stable before unstable and source is essential.
We updated the download area according to your suggestion, set a fix width for
the table and will revise it this evening. If you have more ideas to improve the
page for users, just tell us.
regards,
Otto
> Thanks for taking care of the site.
>
> Agus
>
>
> Tim Sutton wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Werner Macho wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> corrected it - if you find more typos - please report ..
> >>
> >> Speaking from Unstable and Stable .. well probably we should seperate
> >> it - but
> >> Source Code IS already on an own page ..
> >>
> >> I guess it's inside the table to have all things we provide for
> >> download in just one page..
> >>
> >
> > Managing everything in one table is better I think - simplification
> > over complication is good :-) In the table you can just type unstable
> > into the search box to see just unstable packages. You can also sort
> > by columns etc. That should give enough flexibility for those who want
> > it.
> >
> > Thanks for fixing the typo!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
More information about the Qgis-user
mailing list