[Qgis-user] Mac 3.14 dmg, proj

[John Layt]

Hi,

It was being worked on at this GitHub issue
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Mac-Packager/issues/12, and thanks to a GIS
grant (http://blog.qgis.org/2020/07/10/qgis-grant-programme-2020-results/)
the first test version are now available. No ETA for final release as yet
but I'd assume 3.16 now.

Cheers!

John.


On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 at 13:46, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote:

> tl;dr: Why does the mac 3.14 installer use old proj?
>
>
> I've been using 3.10 on NetBSD (built from pkgsrc, against proj 6.3.2),
> and on a mac (downloaded from qgis.org).
>
> I have imagery data in NAD83(2011), claimed to be registered to 0.1m,
> and a point feature in ITRF2014 (also about 0.1m), and I am partly
> trying to check imagery registration, partly just getting used to qgis.
> With the NetBSD build, everything makes sense.  With the Mac build, the
> alignment of the two is different (and I think wrong).  The Mac build is
> using proj 5.2.0 and probably is using WGS84 as a pivot datum.  I bet
> this is using a null transform from NAD83 to WGS84 and then from WGS84
> to ITRF2014, and this is wrong by a meter when transforming modern NAD83
> to ITRF2014.  (I understand how this came to be, why it's been replaced
> and why it gets low accuracy answers.  Regional ground motion is low
> enough not to matter at the level of accuracy I am achieving so far.)
>
> I then installed 3.14.1 on the Mac, from qgis.org, and still got bad
> registration, and saw that it's still using proj 5.2.0.  I had hoped
> that moving off of LTR would get me up-to-date proj.
>
> It seems obvious to me (said knowing that's very dangerous!) that it's
> better to use newer proj with qgis to get the more accurate transforms,
> and that a lot of work has been done in both proj and qgis, so I wonder
> why the 3.14 official mac build is using old proj, and what the plans
> are for moving to proj 6.3.2 or 7.x.
>
> I'm going to try to build qgis on the mac, using pkgsrc, which will use
> newer proj, and see how that is, but I expect to get the same behavior
> (that I think is right/better) because it's building the same sources as
> I built on NetBSD.
>
> Thanks for any insight anyone can provide,
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20200725/2f59564e/attachment.html>