[Qgis-user] Hillshade as layer property vs. Processing Toolbox GDAL hillshade

[Alexandre Neto]

Ah, sorry. I misread it. :-)

A quinta, 14/05/2020, 23:43, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Maria Shinoto <
maria.shinoto at zaw.uni-heidelberg.de> escreveu:

> Dear Alexander,
>
> Thank you for looking into it. As I said, there is no projection on the
> fly, my layer and the file are in EPSG:6670, as is the project.
>
> I will try with a selection from the large layer today!.
>
> Best,
> Maria
>
>
> > Am 14.05.2020 um 23:15 schrieb Alexandre Neto <senhor.neto at gmail.com>:
> >
> > If the project is in one CRS, and the layer is in another, then the
> raster is transformed on-the-fly for sure.
> >
> > Give it a try.
> >
> > A quinta, 14/05/2020, 08:47, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Maria Shinoto <
> maria.shinoto at zaw.uni-heidelberg.de> escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > So the problem occurs only when creating a Hillshade, from a DEM,
> using the hillshade symbology?
> >
> > well, I did not try hillshade in any other case yet, so, yes.
> >
> > > Have you chosen the correct a factor value?
> >
> > What is that? Perhaps there is something I miss?
> >
> > > Try to use the same projection in the project and in the layer so that
> you have no reprojection going on.
> >
> > The project is set to EPSG:6670, and the Raster layer is not projected
> on the fly, but from a file that is in EPSG:6670. So I think, reprojection
> is not the problem here.
> >
> > Thanks for checking this up, if you have an explanation about the factor
> value, that might help.
> >
> > Best,
> > Maria Shinoto
> >
> > >
> > > Nicolas Cadieux
> > > Ça va bien aller!
> > >
> > >> Le 13 mai 2020 à 04:31, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Maria Shinoto <
> maria.shinoto at zaw.uni-heidelberg.de> a écrit :
> > >>
> > >>  Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Today I tried making a hillshade from the raster data you helped me
> out today -- after filling empty pixels, everything looks great.
> > >>
> > >> Now, when trying to set the layer symbology to hillshade, I got
> artifacts with the default setting and the recommend bilinear with medium.
> Looking for a solution, I found this conservation about the same issue (I
> think) from about 3 years ago; it seems to be a problem still today
> (working with QGIS 3.12).
> > >>
> > >>       https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/23859
> > >>
> > >> So I tried the hillshade tool from GDAL in the Processing toolbox
> with identical setting, and everything looks great.
> > >>
> > >> I think that the flawed hillshade in the easily accessible Symbology
> dialogue needs some work or a hint to the GDAL tool in the Processing
> toolbox. It is frustrating for someone who is new.
> > >>
> > >> I add screenshots from the bad results in the Properties > Symbology
> dialogue and the raster image from which I started.
> > >>
> > >> Anyway, it was great to have a solution easily at hand ;-)
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Maria
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> <Bildschirmfoto 2020-05-13 um 13.58.59.jpeg>
> > >>
> > >> <Bildschirmfoto 2020-05-13 um 14.08.53.jpeg>
> > >>
> > >> <Bildschirmfoto 2020-05-13 um 13.59.30.jpeg>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Qgis-user mailing list
> > >> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> > >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-user mailing list
> > Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20200515/473ce071/attachment.html>