[SAC] Subversion Wedgification
arnulf.christl at wheregroup.com
Wed Feb 7 03:49:36 EST 2007
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> sbarnes at dmsolutions.ca wrote:
>> The process of changing backend is simple. As Mateusz says it's a simple
>> dump and reload. The reason it's in BDB is because of it's maturity and
>> it's far easier to recover if anything 'bad' happens. Unfortunetly it
>> a locking problem if a checkout is interrupted somehow. The 1.4.x
>> versions of subversion where supposed to fix this locking problem.
>> If there is consesus on converting to fsfs i can do the conversion.
> Perhaps we could switch over Mapbender which seems to have suffered
> fairly frequent problems, and see if things are thereafter stable?
> Mapbender folks - willing to be a guinea pig?
> Best regards,
Frank Warmerdam asks whether we are happy with them changing SVN from BDB to FSFS. My vote is:
+1 to let them do whatever it takes to get SVN stable.
Ideally you could switch over during your evening hours then we wont even feel anything. Please someone who is subscribed to mapbender_dev notify this list beforehand.
Best regards and thanks for the help,
More information about the Sac