[SAC] Subversion Wedgification

[sbarnes at dmsolutions.ca]

Arnulf,

I can do the switch over at anytime.  What is the best time for you and
mapbender developers?

shawn

> Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>> sbarnes at dmsolutions.ca wrote:
>>> The process of changing backend is simple.  As Mateusz says it's a
>>> simple
>>> dump and reload.  The reason it's in BDB is because of it's maturity
>>> and
>>> it's far easier to recover if anything 'bad' happens.  Unfortunetly it
>>> has
>>> a locking problem if a checkout is interrupted somehow.  The 1.4.x
>>> versions of subversion where supposed to fix this locking problem.
>>>
>>> If there is consesus on converting to fsfs i can do the conversion.
>>
>> Shawn,
>>
>> Perhaps we could switch over Mapbender which seems to have suffered
>> fairly frequent problems, and see if things are thereafter stable?
>>
>> Mapbender folks - willing to be a guinea pig?
>>
>> Best regards,
>
> Hello,
> Frank Warmerdam asks whether we are happy with them changing SVN from BDB
> to FSFS. My vote is:
>
> +1 to let them do whatever it takes to get SVN stable.
>
> Ideally you could switch over during your evening hours then we wont even
> feel anything. Please someone who is subscribed to mapbender_dev notify
> this list beforehand.
>
> Best regards and thanks for the help,
> Arnulf.
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
>