[SAC] svn problem

[Greg Boone]

Just to clarify, we need continued access to the 3.2.1 and 3.2.x
branches in the following repository locations for the indefinite
future. 

 

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdo32x

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdocore

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdoshp

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdosdf

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdowfs

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdowms

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdoarcsde

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdordbms

   https://osgeo.org/svn/fdogdal

 

Greg

 

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Jack Lee
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:35 AM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo
Subject: RE: [SAC] svn problem

 

Hi,

 

Yes, the FDO repositories have been merged for the trunk but we still

need access to the 3.2.1 and 3.2.x branches.

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]

On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot

Sent: February 14, 2007 9:25 AM

To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo

Subject: Re: [SAC] svn problem

 

Howard Butler wrote:

> 

> Have all of the FDO repositories been merged into a single one yet, or

> is that something that is upcoming?

 

AFAIK, they have been merged:

 

http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/2007-February/000781.html

 

Cheers

-- 

Mateusz Loskot

http://mateusz.loskot.net

_______________________________________________

Sac mailing list

Sac at lists.osgeo.org

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

 

_______________________________________________

Sac mailing list

Sac at lists.osgeo.org

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20070214/04ca880a/attachment-0001.html