[SAC] Virtual Hosts Policy
Tyler Mitchell
tylermitchell at shaw.ca
Tue Jan 23 14:14:51 EST 2007
I agree and was arguing that point earlier - I'd personally rather
see fewer drupal instances, that's for sure.
On 23-Jan-07, at 8:16 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Tyler Mitchell wrote:
>> You will see a bunch of rewrites already, at least for the www
>> stuff, to help emulate the past vhost-style setup and forward it
>> to osgeo.org/<project>. This has worked fine except that now
>> certain projects (geodata, local chapters) need to manage the
>> whole content for their site and not just a few pages - so it
>> seems like there is increasing need to stand up more drupal
>> instances.
>
> Tyler,
>
> I can understand wanting distinct drupal instances for projects like
> MapGuide, FDO and Mapbender (assuming they don't prefer to stay wiki
> based), but do committees like geodata and local chapters actually
> require distinct drupal instances? Perhaps an ambitious local chapter
> that wants an extensive amount of material might want it's own
> instance, but for the amounts of material currently living in the
> Wiki this doesn't seem critical.
>
> I guess my point is that I'd prefer avoiding a proliferation of
> Drupal instances if there isn't pressing need. Amoung other things
> we reduce the benefit of the built in drupal search stuff as we
> split things into many instances.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> ---------------------------------------
> +--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
> warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://
> osgeo.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
More information about the Sac
mailing list