[SAC] Virtual Hosts Policy

Tyler Mitchell tylermitchell at shaw.ca
Tue Jan 23 14:14:51 EST 2007


I agree and was arguing that point earlier - I'd personally rather  
see fewer drupal instances, that's for sure.

On 23-Jan-07, at 8:16 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:

> Tyler Mitchell wrote:
>> You will see a bunch of rewrites already, at least for the www  
>> stuff, to help emulate the past vhost-style setup and forward it  
>> to osgeo.org/<project>.  This has worked fine except that now  
>> certain projects (geodata, local chapters) need to manage the  
>> whole content for their site and not just a few pages - so it  
>> seems like there is increasing need to stand up more drupal  
>> instances.
>
> Tyler,
>
> I can understand wanting distinct drupal instances for projects like
> MapGuide, FDO and Mapbender (assuming they don't prefer to stay wiki
> based), but do committees like geodata and local chapters actually
> require distinct drupal instances?  Perhaps an ambitious local chapter
> that wants an extensive amount of material might want it's own
> instance, but for the amounts of material currently living in the
> Wiki this doesn't seem critical.
>
> I guess my point is that I'd prefer avoiding a proliferation of
> Drupal instances if there isn't pressing need.  Amoung other things
> we reduce the benefit of the built in drupal search stuff as we
> split things into many instances.
>
> Best regards,
> -- 
> --------------------------------------- 
> +--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,  
> warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http:// 
> osgeo.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac



More information about the Sac mailing list