[SAC] DVCS support
arnulf.christl at wheregroup.com
Tue Jul 28 11:15:23 EDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mateusz Loskot schrieb:
> Howard Butler wrote:
>> After having received tacit approval from the Board to implement
>> infrastructure for libspatialindex, I would like to explore what
>> variant of distributed version control system SAC would like to support.
> Good idea!
>> Are there any other contenders besides hg and git?
> I was investigating DVCS myself some time ago,
> together with SOCI (soci.sf.net) team and the conclusion was that
> these two are the only mature, efficient, robust and well-supported
> tools available.
> There is plenty ofcomparisons and reviews of DVCS' on Web and blogs
> and most of the ones I've seen are focused on Mercurial and git.
> It seems to be indicative.
> Best regards,
Thanks, that is a good link to get a gist of what drives the decision.
I would suggest to go for Mercurial. This is not motivated by any
technical understanding but the fact that with GeoToolkit we have a
OSGeo friendly project that is already using it.
Spatial Systems Architect
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Sac