[SAC] PostGIS subversion/trac

[Markus Neteler]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, sbarnes <sbarnes at dmsolutions.ca> wrote:
> Howard,
>
> I think the process is approval at SAC based on a SAC member willing to do
> the work :)  Then give the board a heads up and time to comment on what is
> to be done.
>
> +1
>
> -shawn

Apparently it already happened yesterday?
http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-devel/2009-March/005284.html

No more need to vote here...

Markus


> On 23-Mar-09, at 1:37 PM, Howard Butler wrote:
>
>> PostGIS would like to migrate to OSGeo for Trac and Subversion (oops, I've
>> already migrated subversion :) ).  Because PostGIS is an affiliate project,
>> and not an actual OSGeo project, I can't remember the process that we (SAC)
>> must go through to approve giving them infrastructure support.
>>
>> Was our process:
>>
>> 1) motion to SAC, approve, and implement
>>
>> or:
>>
>> 1) motion to SAC, approve
>> 2) SAC notifies Board for approval
>> 3) implement
>>
>> I seem to remember our process being the latter, but I can't remember if
>> we amended it to be the former.  My wiki and google fu were lacking here.
>>
>> By implementing subversion support for PostGIS already, I realize I have
>> done things out of turn.  Their server is/was rapidly spiraling to death, so
>> this at least gives them a temporary home if we were to not approve them for
>> whatever reason.  PostGIS will ultimately want Trac/SVN and maybe mailman
>> support from us, but I'll let Paul expand the request further if there is
>> any.
>>
>> /me motions to provide the PostGIS project with infrastructure support.
>>
>> Bureaucratically-ineptitude'ly yours,
>>
>> Howard
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sac mailing list
>> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
>