[SAC] #682: URGENT? Renew SSL certificate (was: Renew SSL certificate)

Markus Neteler neteler at osgeo.org
Sun May 1 20:03:53 EDT 2011


On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Martin Spott <Martin.Spott at mgras.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:45:28PM -0700, Tyler Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Yeah I appreciate the hand.  It got slowed down for a variety of
>> reasons, [...]
>
> ....  which happens to all of us every now and then  ;-)
>
>
>> [...] What happens after?  I can't remember.
>
> Users of encrypted web pages or IMAP EMail accounts (not sure if have
> this sort of things) will see a notice that the current certificate has
> expired.
> I'm a bit uncertain what's going to happen regarding shell
> authentication.  Our LDAP encryption negotiation on client machines is
> rather strict - which definitely is a Good Thing - but it might hurt
> after the certificate has expired. We'll see.

Well, seems that we are "out" now:


[neteler at north raster]$ svn ci -m"html slightly prettified"
Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.osgeo.org:443':
 - The certificate has expired.
Certificate information:
 - Hostname: *.osgeo.org
 - Valid: from Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 GMT until Sun, 01 May 2011 23:59:59 GMT
 - Issuer: www.digicert.com, DigiCert Inc, US
 - Fingerprint: ae:62:70:35:f5:7b:e4:ad:ec:91:c9:a5:cb:a2:1d:66:d1:70:9e:03
(R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? t
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (500 Internal Server Error)
in response to MKACTIVITY request for
'/grass/!svn/act/5c7c00c0-40b0-4aa6-8d7a-c9d616b73fc0'

[neteler at north raster]$ svn ci -m"html slightly prettified"
Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.osgeo.org:443':
 - The certificate has expired.
Certificate information:
 - Hostname: *.osgeo.org
 - Valid: from Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 GMT until Sun, 01 May 2011 23:59:59 GMT
 - Issuer: www.digicert.com, DigiCert Inc, US
 - Fingerprint: ae:62:70:35:f5:7b:e4:ad:ec:91:c9:a5:cb:a2:1d:66:d1:70:9e:03
(R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? p
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (500 Internal Server Error)
in response to MKACTIVITY request for
'/grass/!svn/act/c2623583-39d7-4732-a7dd-da6e49056b24'

I missed to make my last submission by seconds...
:(

Markus


More information about the Sac mailing list