[SAC] follow up with SAC on website maintenance

[Jody Garnett]

Understood about the historic role, which is why I am bring it up now?

For example if an update is worthwhile (suppose it is eventually) would SAC
be willing to put up a RFP (to cover the issues you raised above?) or is
the kind of thing you would like the board to do?

--
Jody Garnett

On 7 October 2016 at 17:33, Alex Mandel <tech_dev at wildintellect.com> wrote:

> On 10/07/2016 05:22 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
>> One idea I had was to reach out to the marketing committee for website LnF
>> and content, and the system admin committee to run/update/manage the
>> software. I kind of feel like SAC is already taken on the run/manage role,
>> not sure how much work an update would be.
>>
>
> There are several threads regarding this many years back. It was not a
> simple Drupal upgrade, do to previous customizations. The service provider
> directory needs to be rewritten (I think this should be standalone
> anyways), and the translations need to be migrated to a newer data
> structure.
>
> Then there's the eternal struggle with theming...
>
> SAC's historic role has been to ensure the software runs, not to handle
> any of the content, theming, or functionality.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20161009/39c67a4a/attachment.html>