[SAC] follow up with SAC on website maintenance
Jeff McKenna
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Mon Oct 17 07:33:45 PDT 2016
Hi Jody, Martin, I have created a ticket to track these next steps:
https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1805
-jeff
On 2016-10-16 11:24 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Personally I like the idea, however ... the website content is in many
> cases very dated. As an alternative (if you were setting up a new
> machine) interested parties (more likely a work party then just the
> marketing committee) may be interested in a fresh start
> (migrating/updating content to a new server).
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 10 October 2016 at 09:03, Martin Spott <Martin.Spott at mgras.net
> <mailto:Martin.Spott at mgras.net>> wrote:
>
> Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> > For example if an update is worthwhile (suppose it is eventually) would SAC
> > be willing to put up a RFP (to cover the issues you raised above?) or is
> > the kind of thing you would like the board to do?
>
> Some time ago I've been dealing with upgrading parts of the Drupal
> instance and I managed to circumvent what I considered being all the
> relevant issues - until people complained about the missing service
> provider directory :-)
>
> The site still runs Drupal5 on PHP 5.2, current version is Drupal8.
> There *is* a migration path but it'll most certainly drop some pieces
> of the site here and there. I'd offer to perform migration of the
> core, most of our website and fix as many issues as possible, but I'm
> unable to care about every little detail - because I'm no Drupal expert
> and my time doesn't permit reaching that level.
>
> We could set up the new site on a different machine and find someone
> who'd be willing to walk the old and the new site and note the
> differences. This would match website/marketing committee's role, I
> think.
>
> Just a suggestion, let me know what you think about it.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin.
> --
> Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends
> are !
More information about the Sac
mailing list