[SAC] Nominate Harrison to Join SAC

Alex Mandel tech_dev at wildintellect.com
Mon Mar 13 17:40:47 PDT 2017


Apologies, been really bad about keeping track of emails, filtering
system broke down for a week.

Yes based on all positive feedback from multiple members, Harrison is
now part of SAC.

Hopefully he has a report on the marketing proposal's technology
component for the website rebrand.

Thanks,
Alex

On 03/13/2017 07:02 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:38:18AM -0600, Harrison Grundy wrote:
>> I assume the next steps involve a ritual with robes in a cave where we sacrifice livestock. At least, that's how every *other* sysadmin thing I've worked on went.
> 
> LOL
> 
> I expected a mail from Alex to draw conclusions of the vote, so
> it can serve as a reference. Then I guess you'll want to add
> your name and "focus" on the wiki page about SAC, and maybe
> join #osgeo-sac and things like that (we need a formal welcome
> pack here :)
> 
> --strk
> 
>> Harrison
>>
>>> On Mar 13, 2017, at 6:34 AM, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
>>>
>>> Alex, what happened with this nomination ?
>>> Did it pass ? If so, what are the next steps ?
>>>
>>> I'm touching the ground as I'd like to see more sysadmin
>>> work being conducted (mostly Wiki/LDAP integration) and
>>> wondering if Harrison could also help with that :)
>>>
>>> --strk;
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 05:19:36PM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote:
>>>> All, I'd like to nominate Harrison Grundy (aka astrodog) to join SAC.
>>>> He'll be joining initially as our liaison to marketing for the new website
>>>> branding overhaul, and has a track record helping out in the past on various
>>>> SAC issues, as well as professional sys admin experience.
>>>>
>>>> We should probably formalize this, but I suggest for new members we simply
>>>> nominate by existing member, and then give a period of time for anyone to
>>>> voice an objection, 48 hours perhaps? Maybe I should make a motion about
>>>> adopting this practice? Since we don't have it in place, then members should
>>>> vote per normal motions.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alex



More information about the Sac mailing list