[SAC] No more scheduled meetings switch to Asynch Meetings

[Alex M]

There's a reason we started doing the meetings a few months back, async
wasn't sufficient anymore. Once a week is probably too much, hence we
had been doing every other week before that. I would suggest sliding
back to that.

We also shouldn't be hesitant to convene mini meetings among smaller
groups just to tackle specific issues.

I have time today, if some others are available to discuss and implement
 a solution to the smtp on the new limesurvey. There appears to be a
gitea TODO but no SAC ticket on the topic.
https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues/20#issuecomment-3665

Thanks,
Alex

On 10/17/18 06:34, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> I think a monthly SAC meeting is a good idea, and most should be able to
> fit one meeting a month into their schedules.  -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> On 2018-10-17 2:37 AM, Regina Obe wrote:
>> Since no one seems to be able to take out an hour from their busy
>> schedule
>> each week, I've decided to cancel all scheduled meetings.
>> We can still keep the monthly agenda and maybe we can update it as new
>> developments happen.
>>
>> Strk suggested async meeting I have put my notes below and also on the
>> wiki
>> page for this month:
>>
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/SAC_Meeting_2018-10
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ----------------------------
>>> I think we could change back to the wonderful world of async
>>> communication, which is what made the Internet that great
>>> inclusive and ubiquitous place it is.
>>
>>> Like, replying with a new thread for each agenda point ?
>>
>>>   - Talk about harder plans
>>
>>   >    Regina: could you report the progress here ?
>> At last meeting (help Oct 11th)  TemptorSent (Chris) and I finished
>> setting
>> up the ZFS pool and LXD
>>
>> So Osgeo7 is now ready to go:
>>
>>    * Setup nginx lxd
>>    * Move nextcloud to osgeo7 (TemptorSent created a backup and dumped on
>> Osgeo7)
>>    * Make sure new osgeo7 is whitelisted for LDAP
>>
>> ---- Leave rest for Martin and others to respond to
>>   - System contracts
>>
>>     Martin: could you report the status here ?
>>
>>   - GCI program
>>
>>     Jeff, Vicky: anything done for it ?
>>
>>   - Open tickets neding attention (I would let this handled by tickets)
>>
>>   - Other topics: key-only logins
>>
>>     Martin: do you think you will have time/ability to add SSH keys
>>     fields in our LDAP database ? This is handled by ticket
>>     https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2116
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac