[SAC] No more scheduled meetings switch to Asynch Meetings

[Regina Obe]

Sure I'm game.

I have a meeting now but will be done around 2:30 PM or we can do the usual scheduled time of 4 PM today.

Thanks,
Regina

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sac [mailto:sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Alex M
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 12:42 PM
> To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo
> <sac at lists.osgeo.org>; Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>
> Subject: Re: [SAC] No more scheduled meetings switch to Asynch Meetings
> 
> There's a reason we started doing the meetings a few months back, async
> wasn't sufficient anymore. Once a week is probably too much, hence we had
> been doing every other week before that. I would suggest sliding back to that.
> 
> We also shouldn't be hesitant to convene mini meetings among smaller
> groups just to tackle specific issues.
> 
> I have time today, if some others are available to discuss and implement  a
> solution to the smtp on the new limesurvey. There appears to be a gitea
> TODO but no SAC ticket on the topic.
> https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues/20#issuecomment-3665
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
> 
> On 10/17/18 06:34, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> > I think a monthly SAC meeting is a good idea, and most should be able
> > to fit one meeting a month into their schedules.  -jeff
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2018-10-17 2:37 AM, Regina Obe wrote:
> >> Since no one seems to be able to take out an hour from their busy
> >> schedule each week, I've decided to cancel all scheduled meetings.
> >> We can still keep the monthly agenda and maybe we can update it as
> >> new developments happen.
> >>
> >> Strk suggested async meeting I have put my notes below and also on
> >> the wiki page for this month:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/SAC_Meeting_2018-10
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -------
> >>
> >> ----------------------------
> >>> I think we could change back to the wonderful world of async
> >>> communication, which is what made the Internet that great inclusive
> >>> and ubiquitous place it is.
> >>
> >>> Like, replying with a new thread for each agenda point ?
> >>
> >>>   - Talk about harder plans
> >>
> >>   >    Regina: could you report the progress here ?
> >> At last meeting (help Oct 11th)  TemptorSent (Chris) and I finished
> >> setting up the ZFS pool and LXD
> >>
> >> So Osgeo7 is now ready to go:
> >>
> >>    * Setup nginx lxd
> >>    * Move nextcloud to osgeo7 (TemptorSent created a backup and
> >> dumped on
> >> Osgeo7)
> >>    * Make sure new osgeo7 is whitelisted for LDAP
> >>
> >> ---- Leave rest for Martin and others to respond to   - System
> >> contracts
> >>
> >>     Martin: could you report the status here ?
> >>
> >>   - GCI program
> >>
> >>     Jeff, Vicky: anything done for it ?
> >>
> >>   - Open tickets neding attention (I would let this handled by
> >> tickets)
> >>
> >>   - Other topics: key-only logins
> >>
> >>     Martin: do you think you will have time/ability to add SSH keys
> >>     fields in our LDAP database ? This is handled by ticket
> >> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2116
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Regina
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sac mailing list
> > Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac