[Spanish] Fwd: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Standards] Fw: [TC-Announce] GeoServices REST API adoption vote - update and motion to withdraw
Arnold Fernández Rivas
arnoldfiarn at gmail.com
Thu May 30 10:16:41 PDT 2013
Eso es una buena noticia.
2013/5/30 Pedro-Juan Ferrer Matoses <pferrer en osgeo.org>
> Hola Gente,
>
> un update importante en el caso del GeoServices REST API.
>
> La OGC ha retirado la proposición para convertir el esquema de ESRI en
> estandar, para que pueda ser más ampliamente debatida por la comunidad
> antes de aceptarla como estandar OGC.
>
> Muchas gracias a todos los que os implicasteis en la difusión y los
> que firmasteis la carta.
>
> Un saludo,
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter en gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Standards] Fw: [TC-Announce]
> GeoServices REST API adoption vote - update and motion to withdraw
> To:
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions <discuss en lists.osgeo.org>,
> "standards en lists.osgeo.org" <standards en lists.osgeo.org>
>
>
> osgeo-discuss, osgeo-standards,
>
> As below, the GeoServices REST API has been withdrawn as a proposed
> OGC standard, and OGC are looking at ways to improve based upon our
> collective feedback from OSGeo and OGC members.
>
> Thank you to all the people who have voiced their concerns, thank you
> to those who provided detailed reasoning and analysis, and thank you
> to the OGC and OGC members who have acknowledged and have started
> actioning this reasoning. You are contributing toward a better OGC for
> us all.
>
> On 30/05/2013 1:57 PM, Carl Reed wrote:
>
> Dear OSGeo Community -
>
> Today I sent out an email to the OGC membership regarding the current
> status of the GeoServices adoption vote. Please see the email below.
>
> We appreciate the input provided by the OSGeo community during the
> voting process. Based on the discussion and comments that occurred
> during this vote, we will be engaging Members as well as the
> implementation community in discussions regarding how to evolve and
> improve the OGC standards setting process.
>
> Thanks and regards
>
> Carl Reed, PhD
> CTO
> OGC
>
>
>
> From: Carl Reed
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 10:11 AM
> To: TC Announce
> Subject: [TC-Announce] GeoServices REST API adoption vote - update
> andmotion to withdraw
>
>
> Dear TC -
>
>
>
> On Tuesday of this week, the GeoServices REST API Standards Working
> Group (SWG) voted to approve the following recommendation to the TC
> Voting Members:
>
>
>
> The GeoServices REST SWG recommends the TC approve withdrawal of the
> motion to approve the OGC GeoServices REST API documents as an
> official OGC standard. Moved: Keith Ryden. Second: Clemens Portele.
> There was no objection to unanimous consent.
>
>
>
> The following is the reason for requesting the motion to approve the
> candidate standard be withdrawn:
>
>
>
> “Considering the breath of discussion both internal and external to
> the OGC process since the vote announcement, the SWG members feel that
> the vote cannot continue until the many questions raised have been
> addressed. Issues regarding OGC process, vendor advantage, duplication
> of capabilities, etc. have now overshadowed technical discussions of
> the merits of the specification. By withdrawing the OGC GeoServices
> REST API candidate standard, the necessary discussions regarding OGC
> process, policy, and position can continue separately.”
>
> The SWG further discussed the need for OGC Members and staff to
> debate, clarify and potentially amend a number of policy and
> procedural issues before the SWG can decide to either disband or to
> resume technical work on the candidate standard
>
>
>
> Today or tomorrow the TC Chair (me) will be asking the TC Voting
> Members to consider the GeoServices REST API SWG recommendation. The
> motion is:
>
>
>
> “The GeoServices REST API SWG recommends that the GeoServices adoption
> vote be withdrawn. If there is no objection to unanimous consent in
> the next 10 calendar days, then the motion is approved. If there are
> objections, than a two week e-vote will be initiated.”
>
>
>
> Over the coming months there will be opportunities for OGC staff,
> members and the general public to engage in discussions related to
> policy and procedures, such as clear statements on openness and
> interoperability, overlapping standards, backwards compatibility and
> so forth. The idea is to begin a dialogue as part of the virtual
> meetings this and next month with a goal to address the issues raised
> and recommend changes at the upcoming September Frascati meetings.
>
>
>
> I would like to thank the SWG for all of their hard work on the
> candidate standard. I would also like to thank everyone who
> contributed to the conversation.
>
>
>
> Any questions, please let me know.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Carl Reed, PhD
> CTO and Executive Director Standards Program
> Open Geospatial Consortium
> www.opengeospatial.org
>
> The OGC: Making Location Count!
>
> ---------------------
>
> This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
> addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
> disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy
> all copies.
>
> "The important thing is not to stop questioning." -- Albert Einstein
> "Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature. Life
> is either a daring adventure or nothing." -- Helen Keller
>
> ________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> TC-Announce mailing list
> TC-Announce en lists.opengeospatial.org
>
> This is an auto-subscribe list. All OGC members are required to
> maintain a subscription to this list. You may change your delivery
> options in the "Email Subscriptions" portion of "My Account" in the
> OGC Web Portal.
>
> https://portal.opengeospatial.org/?m=users&a=viewuser&tab=3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Standards en lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>
>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter
> Geospatial Solutions Manager
> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
>
> Think Globally, Fix Locally
> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
> http://www.lisasoft.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss en lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Pedro-Juan Ferrer Matoses
> Valencia (España)
> _______________________________________________
> Spanish mailing list
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/spanish
> http://es.osgeo.org
> http://twitter.com/osgeoes
>
--
**
*Arnold Fernández Rivas*
*Cel.: 970048131 movistar*
------------ pr?xima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/spanish/attachments/20130530/5fe1efa9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Spanish
mailing list