[OSGeo-Standards] Fwd: TEAM Engine and CITE infrastructure [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Luis Bermudez lbermudez at opengeospatial.org
Fri May 9 04:02:16 PDT 2014


Hi Bruce and Jeff

At the CITE SC we had a discussion about moving using Eclipse infrastructure for issue tracking,  helping with releases and code review.  Folks at the meeting were OK with this. We thought that before making the decision we should have an open call allowing for others interested to let us know. This is why I contact Jeff.

From OSGEO incubation viewpoint, I'm not sure where we stand. I think TEAM Engine is still incubation at OSGEO, and Im not sure what the implications are if we use Eclipse infrastructure. We haven't really made any advancements other than do some testing to package TEAM Engine in a virtual box for OSGeo Live.


- Luis

---------------------------------------------------
Luis Bermudez, Ph.D.
Director Compliance Program
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
The OGC: Making Location Count

Skype: bermudez_luis
Twitter: @berdez
Tel: +1 301 760 7323
http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/organization/staff/lbermudez




On May 8, 2014, at 7:02 PM, Bruce Bannerman <B.Bannerman at bom.gov.au> wrote:

> Jeff,
> 
> At the Washington TC, Luis announced that OGC are setting up an arrangement with from memory, the Eclipse Foundation, to help move this software forward.
> 
> There was no real rationale provided on this that I recall.
> 
> I also did not get a chance to follow up with Luis as to what this meant for the OSGeo Incubation process that the products are going through.
> 
> Perhaps Luis or Carl could comment.
> 
> Can anyone advise what is happening with CITE from the OSGeo Incubation viewpoint?
> 
> Is there an active project?
> 
> What organisations are supporting the Project?
> 
> What is the status of CITE incubation?
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: standards-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [standards-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna [jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 8 May 2014 10:46 PM
> To: standards at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [OSGeo-Standards] Fwd: TEAM Engine and CITE infrastructure
> 
> Hello OSGeo standards community,
> 
> I received a request (below) from Luis Bermudez, head of the OGC
> compliance group, wondering if OSGeo might be able to help hosting their
> CITE architecture.  Note that he sent this to me a day after the
> deadline listed on the call, so I don't think we should pay much
> attention to that date.  What are the thoughts on helping them?
> 
> I will also mention this at next week's OSGeo board meeting.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: TEAM Engine and CITE infrastructure
> Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 13:45:36 -0400
> From: Luis Bermudez <lbermudez at opengeospatial.org>
> To: Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>
> 
> Hi Jeff
> 
> We have had lots of discussion about moving the OGC CITE software
> infrastructure  to a different place.  We were advise after the last TC
> to do a press release to see which organizations can provide support for
> issue tracking, releases, code review etc. We recently published this
> press release
> http://www.opengeospatial.org/pressroom/pressreleases/1998
> 
> Maybe OSGeo is interested? I didn't heard from anybody from OSGeo.
> Please let me know what you think.
> 
> Thank you very much!
> 
> 
> 
> - Luis
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Luis Bermudez, Ph.D.
> Director Compliance Program
> Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
> The OGC: Making Location Count
> 
> Skype: bermudez_luis
> Twitter: @berdez
> Tel: +1 301 760 7323
> http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/organization/staff/lbermudez
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Standards at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Standards at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards



More information about the Standards mailing list