[OSGeo-Standards] membership renewals
gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr
Tue Oct 17 00:24:56 PDT 2017
I have to apologize for all the noise I have made about this issue.
My reaction is reflecting the importance that this slot is for me and most of all for the ZOO-Project.
I do agree with what you have said Arnulf, you have done and do a great job in dealing with the slot distribution and as it become more popular, I also agree that some rules should be put in place. I did not do my duties so, it is my fault and not somebody else. I should not wait for you to chase me as you did in the past for having a report posted on the wiki.
I am sorry for not having updated the community with the work we are handling in the WPS-2.0 SWG, I should have communicated more often about how do I use the slot.
Sorry again Arnulf, there was nothing at all against you personally.
Thanks again for your great work and I will try to reapply soon.
> Le 16 oct. 2017 à 18:13, Arnulf Christl <arnulf.christl at metaspatial.net> a écrit :
> just to clarify, Gérald was not "removed" from OGC membership. The
> underlying assumption somewhat bothers me. He can also reapply any time,
> just like anybody else.
> Most OSGeo members fail to react to OGC renewal requests and most also
> failed to produce a single report throughout the years (including
> yourself) although we have repeatedly asked for them.
> Admittedly I have grown somewhat tired of chasing folks to produce some
> kind of proof that they are actually using the OGC Individual Membership
> slots for something useful (and then get berated if the consequence is
> that their slot is not automagically prolonged). The OSGeo community
> should know what their members are doing with their individual OGC
> membership slots. It could all be so simple. In keeping with the popular
> German saying "Do good (things) and talk about it". Hopefully you can
> implement a better mechanism.
> Regarding your addition to the "Selection Committee"; As I said before,
> the "selection" process so far has been down-to-earth pragmatic: Accept
> all. We never had an issue because there were always enough open slots.
> If change is seen to be needed, please go ahead.
> Process: Initially Michael Gerlek and myself were appointed by the
> board. I have then accepted Michael's resignation and later added Bruce
> Bannerman who had indicated interest (thanks, Bruce) and was happy to
> help. So I guess that Bruce should acknowledges your addition to this
> list and then the Board (copied) should formally confirm my resignation
> and accept your addition - or come up with a different process altogether.
> Hope this helps.
> All the best,
>  https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OGC_Membership#Selection_Committee
> Am 16.10.2017 um 16:42 schrieb Jeff McKenna:
>> Hi Bruce and Arnulf,
>> Apparently Gérald Fenoy was recently removed from the membership, but
>> he has been very active at the TC meetings in terms of WPS evolution
>> for the past 2 years. I think this validates his ability to renew the
>> OGC membership, correct? He may have missed Barabara's renewal emails
>> however. Can Gérald contact Barabara directly now to renew the
>> In a bigger sense, this example may require us to examine how we track
>> who is using the memberships (because sending an email to this
>> Standards list isn't always the best example of using the membership -
>> I know in my own case through the years, the membership helped me
>> enter & follow discussions elsewhere on OGC+OSGeo, which is very
>> Another question: maybe this was also the case for Dimitris'
>> membership? I am not sure though. Difficult to track. Maybe there
>> are ideas on how to manage this.
>> (I am not sure if the nomination for adding me into the Selection
>> Committee finalized)
>> Standards mailing list
>> Standards at lists.osgeo.org
> Spatially enabling your business.
More information about the Standards