[OSGeo-Standards] Input required from OSGeo Standards List Members
gdt at lexort.com
Thu Sep 2 05:15:19 PDT 2021
Bruce Bannerman <bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com> writes:
> The context and link to the proposed OSGeo/OGC MOU may be found in Tom Kralidis’ email here:
I found that really hard to follow.
First, there's the problem of using google docs. I find that
unacceptable in the open source community, because of proprietary
software and tracking by an advertising company. I suspect many (but
not all) people in the osgeo community are also not happy about that.
I asked for a pdf of the propsoed MOU, because presumably that's the
form it would be adopted in, as a document of record.
I see some notes that could lead to a draft that could then be proposed,
but I don't see a "proposed MOU".
So if there is text that is actually proposed to be adopted, please put
it someplace not on google, as pdf, so that the *proposed MOU* can be
If there isn't yet actual proposed text, that's fine -- but please call
notes toward a draft soemthing else.
Sorry to sound difficult (except for about google docs :-) but I am
really unable to understand what is going on.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards