[Tilecache] DiskCache through multiple disks

[Pedro Mendes]

>From my understanding to attain that set up with TileCache you must have
one TileCache instance for each region you.

In my case I'm trying upgrade only the disk storage without adding and
configuring more TileCache instances. Don't if that's possible, though...

Thanks for the feedback.

2012/1/16 Jorge Arévalo <jorge.arevalo at deimos-space.com>

> Hi,
>
> Ok, I misunderstood. Sorry.
>
> I actually have a slightly different situation, with different
> machines, each of one storing tiles of all the desired zoom levels but
> from different parts of the world. All machines together form a big
> coverage. Trying MapProxy and TileCache. But I think it doesn't fit
> your problem.
>
> Sorry again.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Pedro Mendes <p.m.g.mendes at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Chris and Jorge,
> >
> > @Jorge
> > I'm looking for options using only our client infrastructure.
> >
> > @ Chris
> > That's an option, for sure. What I was looking to know is about
> > the possibility of splitting the tiles through different disks (on
> different
> > machines or not) and only having one tilecache instance. It will be
> > achievable having several disks in the same machine each one keeping the
> > tiles of a different zoom level?
> >
> > We're evaluating options, right now.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, <christopher.schmidt at nokia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 16, 2012, at 9:18 AM, ext Jorge Arévalo wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Pedro Miguel  Mendes
> >> > <p.m.g.mendes at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Can anyone give me a scenario where one could set up multiple disks
> to
> >> >> store
> >> >> the tiles in a distributed way? All the disks are in machines in the
> >> >> same
> >> >> infrastructure.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > What about a distributed TMS/WMTS service? Using a Cloud
> infrastructure.
> >>
> >> ... What? How is that related to the question he's asking? :p
> >>
> >> Pedro: I don't have any suggestions on storing tiles across multiple
> >> machines.
> >> One of the things I Know people have done before is given multiple
> >> machines
> >> different DNS names, and then used deterministic round-robin (like the
> >> tile
> >> generation in OpenLayers) -- then, each server only gets some of the
> >> requests
> >> (where 'some' is the number of servers you have in the round robin).
> >>
> >> -- Chris
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jorge Arévalo
> Internet & Mobility Division, DEIMOS
> jorge.arevalo at deimos-space.com
> http://mobility.grupodeimos.com/
> http://www.libregis.org
> http://geohash.org/ezjqgrgzz0g
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tilecache/attachments/20120116/e73ed9ea/attachment.html