[Tiling] Tilestore Benchmarks
Oliver Tonnhofer
olt at omniscale.de
Mon May 2 09:35:54 EDT 2011
Hi there,
I promised to post my benchmarks of an SQLite based tile store. I had to rerun my tests with different options and different cache sizes, but here are finally the results:
http://dev.mapproxy.org/misc/tilestorebench/
As you'll notice, SQLite is faster in any benchmark and some of the numbers are quite impressive.
With a hot filecache, the SQLite store peeked at 26k tiles/s while the file system peeked only at 2.5k (the graphs are smoothed with a running average of 10). Even for tile sets that do not fit in memory SQLite is much faster (~300 vs. ~150t/s with meta requests, ~85 vs ~40t/s for complete random requests).
Regards,
Oliver
--
Oliver Tonnhofer | Omniscale GmbH & Co KG | http://omniscale.de
http://mapproxy.org | https://bitbucket.org/olt | @oltonn
More information about the Tiling
mailing list