[Web Comm] RE: Site support

[Frank Warmerdam]

Jason Birch wrote:
> I don't have any problem adding the Site Support link to the footer, but
> I can't see if I have access to the site template files from here.
> 
> At the same time, the content of the other links there really needs to
> be reviewed.  The first two links are pretty much useless, and I'm not
> sure if the Privacy Policy has been reviewed by the board as an official
> statement.

Folks,

I think the "Support" link would essentially replace the Feedback link,
right?  I think the Domain FAQ (aka Site FAQ) is pretty weak.  We might
consider incorporating some of this information off the Support page,
or even putting a limited amount of it into the OSGeo FAQ.

I believe the board has been made aware of the privacy statement though
I'm not sure we reviewed it carefully.  I have looked it over now and
it seems quite reasonable.  We all obviously need to keep the committment
about not sharing mailing addresses and names.  If you think the board
needs to approve it, I can ensure it is addressed by the board.

> Site FAQ should probably point to
> https://www.osgeo.org/content/faq/foundation_faq.html
> Feedback should probably be disabled, as the info at osgeo.org address
> fills that role.

Agreed.  btw, is the info at osgeo.org archive viewable somewhere?  Who
does this go to?

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGF, http://osgeo.org