[Wps-discuss] Benchmarking...

[Jody Garnett]

Thanks for your interest; I have contacted the dev teams this week; and will organise for discussions next week. You are of course welcome to help out :-)
So far I have managed to contact most groups; still looking to hear from open layers "wps client" rep - as I would like to see more clients into the mix.

I will also caution for the wms-shoot out experience is that it is very easy to try and take on too much. With open source projects volunteer effort goes into the project; and you have to be careful that any activities like this are productive (in real hard coding terms) and not a distraction or off topic. So anything we can do to make participation easier will be very helpful.

Jody

On 04/02/2011, at 11:51 PM, nicolas bozon wrote:

> Hello All,
> 
> Late but I'd also be interested in participating in the WPS Benchmarking.
> 
> My 2 cents on which topics the differents teams could benchmark:
> - Server deployement and configuration
> - Method used to create new WPS Services
> - Method used to chain WPS Services
> - XML compliancy
> 
> If the exercise can be, i'd be glad to participate and potentialy help on the wiki.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2011/2/1 Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
> Nice timing Mr Fenoy :-)
> 
> I actually just took this idea off the back burner; and have emailed the various project teams to see if there is any interest in doing a "wps bakeoff" for foss4g. The idea this early in the game is to focus on benching the servers and showing what they can do.
> 
> Jody
> 
> On 30/01/2011, at 9:36 PM, Gérald Fenoy wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > a bit late but I would like to second the Jody's proposal for the WPS benchmarking.
> >
> > I would like to propose myself for any help requested in such a task.
> >
> > Hope to hear from you,
> > best
> >
> > Le 9 déc. 2010 à 02:03, Jody Garnett a écrit :
> >
> >> Thanks Jeff; I am still very much in favour of undertaking wps benchmarking.
> >>
> >> We really should go through some of your lessons learned from the WMS exercise; perhaps you can help steer us away from trouble spots or common misunderstandings.
> >>
> >> Only thing I can think of is to get the goal/tests on the table quickly; and give people plenty of time to dial it in to a useful level of difficulty.
> >>
> >> Jody
> >>
> >> On 09/12/2010, at 7:05 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> >>
> >>> We've begun talking of the WMS Benchmarking exercise for 2011 at FOSS4G, and in fact work will probably begin in early January with a kickoff meeting.  I just thought of the WPS gang, to give you all a heads up to start preparing now, if you are going to organize a WPS benchmarking exercise.
> >>>
> >>> I can tell you that is extremely demanding to do, so start now.
> >>>
> >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Benchmarking_2011
> >>>
> >>> -jeff
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jeff McKenna
> >>> MapServer Consulting and Training Services
> >>> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Wps-discuss mailing list
> >>> Wps-discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/wps-discuss
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wps-discuss mailing list
> >> Wps-discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/wps-discuss
> >
> > Djay
> > gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wps-discuss mailing list
> Wps-discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/wps-discuss
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/wps-discuss/attachments/20110205/d0eec519/attachment.html