[GRASS-dev] Re: g.gui
landa.martin at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 17:03:53 EST 2008
2008/2/14, Hamish <hamish_b at yahoo.com>:
> > > > > is type= the best word to use as the option name?
> > > > > gui=? start=? (like d.mon) launch=? ???= ?
> > Suggestions are always welcomed...
> All I can think of is flavor= but that's a bit funny.
'flavor' would be OK I think, not so boring as 'type':-)
> >>>> Can the wxgui startup take a saved project file as a command
> >>>> line option like d.m and gis.m? (dmrc=)
> > > state=? (like nviz) project=? ???
> > 'project' would be good or e.g. 'workspace' (it is called in GUI
> > 'workspace file'). I am not sure if 'workspace' makes sense here,
> > maybe calling it 'project' is better, suggestions?
> Workspace could be ok. I worry that Project would be sounding too close
> to LOCATION. It's a little long but in practice you don't have to give
> the parser the whole word.
BTW, I used in wxGUI for workspace files extension 'grc'. Maybe time
to change it. What about gwf/gws (GRASS workspace file) - but [1,2],
or gwd (grass workspace definition), suggestions?
> > BTW, are we going to backport g.gui to 6.3?, maybe not.
> Sure why not? Less confusion later and some motivation to get it
> finished now.
I updated init.sh, testing welcomed. I can backport wxpython directory
and related changes let say tomorrow to releasebranch_6_3, and on
Sunday we could release RC5?
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
More information about the grass-dev