[Journal] Update on Journal

[Tyler Mitchell]

FYI it looks like the login system should work now - you only have to do a password reset request (using the 'forgot password' page) and you should be able to get in.  Let me know if you cannot afterwards:
Here's the direct link to get your password.  I doubt that anyone's will work without resetting it this way first, since the previous system did not store your password until now.

https://www.osgeo.org/ojs/index.php/journal/login/lostPassword

Tyler

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)" <tmitchell at osgeo.org>
Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 5:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Journal] Update on Journal
To: newsletter at lists.osgeo.org

> On Wednesday 25 November 2009 08:29:04 Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> > Tyler has been working over the last week or two to fix some 
> bugs we
> > are having in OJS.
> 
> This is a bit of a struggle at the moment - basically our LDAP 
> authentication 
> backend isn't working with OJS at the moment.  So I've had 
> to change the way 
> users are authenticated.
> 
> Could the current editors/reviewers please try logging in and 
> let me know if 
> you still cannot.  In that case I'll have to reset your 
> password for you.  
> Sorry for the confusion on this.
> 
> Landon or others, could you please try logging and dropping me a note?
>  
> All your changes and suggestions re: vol 6 sound good - thanks 
> so much for 
> keeping us on our toes.  Editors who have stuck with us 
> during this transition 
> to OJS and waterfalling deadlines, thank you too!
> 
> > One more thing: Tyler and I discussed keeping only the first 
> submittal> and the final article copy in OJS. All of the edits 
> and revisions (and
> > a final copy) of the article would be kept in the SVN 
> repository for
> > the Journal. We would copy the article from OJS to the SVN 
> when it was
> > converted to LaTex.
> 
> Could I suggest a small change to that?  
> 
> It might be best to keep the various review/edit cycles in OJS - 
> since the 
> communication tools are there to support that.  After the 
> higher level 
> editing, copyediting and reviewing is done - THEN move it to 
> SVN.  
> 
> So, don't move it to SVN until it's all out of the authors and 
> reviewers hands 
> - then SVN won't be a barrier for anyone.  This would also 
> be the time we want 
> to start adding the .tex files into a master document for a 
> draft compiled 
> volume.
> 
> Does that make sense?  Sorry if I wasn't clear 
> earlier  :[
> 
> Tyler
> _______________________________________________
> newsletter mailing list
> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/newsletter/attachments/20091126/cacbd7c2/attachment.html