[postgis-devel] postgis-1.5.sql

[Paragon Corporation]

I personally like the idea of numbering the whole contrib/postgis-1.5

That is what I have done with the Windows installs.  Its easier to manage I
think, because each version is in its own folder so you don't have to guess
what goes with what.  Like naming uninstall etc. and changing the script
each version 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 5:18 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] postgis-1.5.sql

Well, problem solved then, if I'm the only one who ever objected (and at a
different circumstance at that). I guess I don't have the courage of my
convictions.

P.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Chris Hodgson <chodgson at refractions.net>
wrote:
> Paul, you bring this question up so often it makes me wonder if there 
> really is a reason...
>
> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-devel/2009-August/006
> 599.html
>
> It all pints back to:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/94
>
> Where it seems the argument against numbering the .sql was that you'd 
> have to also number the .so, which you didn't want to do because it 
> complicated the update process.
>
> Chris
>
> Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>
>> What do we think about numbering the SQL file? I think it seems wise, 
>> is there a reason to not do it?
>>
>> P
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel