[postgis-devel] 2.1 beta status Vote: +1

[dustymugs]

+1 now.

On 05/03/2013 07:56 PM, Bborie Park wrote:
> I'll have ST_ColorMap done sometime next week.
> 
> -bborie
> 
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 18:03 -0400, Paragon Corporation wrote:
>>
>>>> I'd love to.  Does it require it to be feature complete though or does
>>>> it not have to be feature complete for beta?
>>>>   I think we are more or less feature complete at this point.
>>
>>> Well, a beta usually means feature complete, so...
>>
>> Devrim,
>>
>> Strk and I are on board.  Paul I think is traveling so hasn't given his two
>> cents.
>> Mark is probably on holiday.
>>
>> That said.  I've pushed all outstanding stuff to 2.2 that I don't think has
>> a chance in hell of making 2.1
>> in next week and I don't see evidence that it is actively being worked on .
>> I suspect we'll be a tad bit later than 9.3beta1, but shooting for next week
>> to close out the final things.
>>
>> Olivier is going to work on getting his cgal configure stuff in place this
>> weekend. This will change more how you compile than anything and won't
>> change your compiling unless you are building with the optional 3D stuff.
>> So again I think this can slide past beta release if needed.
>>
>> And I've committed all outstanding patches or pushing them forward if I
>> thought they were not good enough.
>>
>> What we are left with that aren't enhancements are listed here:
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopen
>> ed&order=priority&col=id&col=summary&col=milestone&col=status&col=type&col=p
>> riority&col=component&milestone=PostGIS+2.1.0&type=enhancement&type=patch
>>
>>
>> The PAGC one I'm working on and is actually in place (just working out some
>> kinks) but is really an extra (not part of core PostGIS).  ST_ColorMap I
>> really want to see in 2.1  so am willing to bend the rules if we are okay
>> with a beta release not having it. Besides Bborie is always fast about
>> jumping on things so he might surprise me and get it in next week.
>>
>> Rest of stuff not listed are bug fixes that are truly bugs and won't change
>> the user facing API so don't think are necessary for a beta release.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>> http://www.postgis.us
>> http://postgis.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>