[Qgis-psc] feature freeze with 54 pull requests !!!

Andreas Neumann a.neumann at carto.net
Sun Jan 17 03:40:03 PST 2016


Yes - this would be really useful to have in 2.14!

One of my upcoming projects will be around QGIS server and tiling - so I 
am really interested in seeing this land in master and - if possible -  
in 2.14.

Andreas

On 17.01.2016 09:35, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Jan 2016 7:08 PM, "Marco Hugentobler" 
> <marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch 
> <mailto:marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > There are only 7 un-merged pull requests with the milestones '2.14' 
> ( 
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A2.14). 
> That's because the dev team made a huge effort reviewing the many pull 
> requests.
> >
> > #2676, #2358, #2630, #2342 seem to be new features. The others can 
> be classified as bug fixes.
> >
> > Don't know if we should still merge those 4 pull requests. It seems 
> fair to me, but the decision is up to Jürgen as a release manager.
>
> I'd still also like to see 2666 merged  - given that the code is all 
> fine, its just a weird sip compile error on Travis delaying it.
>
> Nyall
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marco
> >
> >
> > On 16.01.2016 15:24, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16-01-16 15:19, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Richard,
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 16. Jan 2016 at 15:04:18 +0100, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> @Juergen: I think part of the freeze/release process we as PSC maybe
> >>>> should sent an email to all devs/PR-builders to tell them that we are
> >>>> going to go in feature freeze within x days, and IF you want your 
> PR in,
> >>>> that you have to put some marketing/energy in it if you want it 
> to land
> >>>> into that version x...
> >>>
> >>> Well, the feature freeze date is long set.  So that should be well 
> known
> >>> anyway.  We also have a countdown on the website and in the IRC 
> channel
> >>> topic.
> >>>
> >>> And Matthias sent out a posting on:
> >>> 
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-January/040926.html
> >>
> >> Oops, ok. Sorry me bad, missed that one too apparently...
> >>
> >> Thanks Matthias!!
> >>
> >> Still... any other ideas then, to get a shorter PR list?
> >>
> >> Richard
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> > Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> > Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
> > marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch 
> <mailto:marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch> http://www.sourcepole.ch
> > Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160117/9301c7c4/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list