[Wps-discuss] shootout 2013

Jody Garnett jody.garnett at gmail.com
Tue Aug 27 16:51:48 PDT 2013


Quick logistics question, where is the presentation in the program?   

While I have managed to attend the conference, it is dependent on running the recording sessions :D As such I would really like to know what room it is so I have a chance to take part.  

--  
Jody Garnett


On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 8:15 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:

> Hi all,
>  
> I hope, there is already person in your WPS community, which will take
> responsibility for the WPS Shootout/roundup presentation for FOSS4G,
> which starts in few weeks. So far, there is only few lines from 52North
> project.
>  
> The presentation is divided into 4 sections, every project has reserved
> slide in each section, so it would be nice, if you could write something
> into four slides:
>  
> 1 - General project description
> 2 - What you consider special about your project
> 3 - What you consider problematic about your project
> 4 - People behind each project
>  
> I would also like Benjamin Proß or anybody else from the wps 2.0.0 team,
> to add some infos about their work (will contact them separately).
>  
> Anybody has different opinion about the shootout, or different proposal
> how we should do it? If not, please go ahead (or I'll shoot you)!
>  
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MJMLthdLjKwyyA3Tf2b6VmyKJdcj8SULi-HoRpKTZRA/edit#slide=id.p
>  
> Jachym - deputy sheriff
>  
> Dne 25.7.2013 06:11, Jody Garnett napsal(a):
> > On Wednesday, 24 July 2013 at 9:43 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >  
> > > sorry for delay, back at work (mostly, still),
> > >  
> > > so, what will we do? Shell we start with the wiki, where everybody
> > > will add some features of particular project, so at the end, we
> > > will have table of project (columns) and their features (rows), so
> > > we can see, what's interesting where?
> > >  
> >  
> >  
> > You may want to make a shared google presentation, so people can fill
> > in project details & information (and collaborate on what will be
> > shown?)
> > > We could also do client-server crosscheck, each client would draw  
> > > (randomly pick) some server, and then both (server and client)
> > > could demonstrate their compatibility (of course, hard work on both
> > > sides is assumed).
> > >  
> >  
> >  
> > I think if teams could provide a download (or service) link it would
> > be great. Teams that provide a download earlier will get the most
> > testing in. That said last time we were really light on clients :(
> >  
> > I have gotten a few questions off-list asking what is going on as
> > they could not see WPS on the FOSS4G program.
> >  
> > Aside: You could also go for "WPS Roundup" which may be taken as let
> > adversarial than "shootout"
> >  
>  
>  
> --  
> Jachym Cepicky
> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com (http://gmail.com)
> http://les-ejk.cz
> PGP: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp
>  
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/wps-discuss/attachments/20130828/6fb8cc4b/attachment.html>


More information about the Wps-discuss mailing list