[OSGeo-Board] board.osgeo.org visibility

[Frank Warmerdam]

Rich Steele wrote:
> I agree with Chris. We may want to mine the existing list to make sure 
> there are not things that should be kept private.  The vote and tiebreak 
> is a good example.  I also agree there should be a private list, the use 
> of which should be discouraged, but which can be used for sensitive 
> topics (as well as for legal advice that is only for board eyes).

Rich / Chris,

I am happy to have the detailed voting information and our tie breaking
deliberations stripped out of the archive for privacies sake.  I think
someone ought to review the archive to see that anything else sensitive
is removed as well though I can't think of anything off hand.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGF, http://osgeo.org