[OSGeo-Board] board.osgeo.org visibility

[Chris Holmes]

Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Rich Steele wrote:
> 
>> I agree with Chris. We may want to mine the existing list to make sure 
>> there are not things that should be kept private.  The vote and 
>> tiebreak is a good example.  I also agree there should be a private 
>> list, the use of which should be discouraged, but which can be used 
>> for sensitive topics (as well as for legal advice that is only for 
>> board eyes).
> 
> 
> Rich / Chris,
> 
> I am happy to have the detailed voting information and our tie breaking
> deliberations stripped out of the archive for privacies sake.  I think
> someone ought to review the archive to see that anything else sensitive
> is removed as well though I can't think of anything off hand.
Nothing from me.  I had actually always thought it was public visible, 
and the voting stuff actually raised a red flag for me, though I then 
realized that it was in fact private.  Ideally we could archive that 
stuff in board-private, but that might be asking too much.

Chris

> 
> Best regards,

-- 
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
thoughts at: http://cholmes.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cholmes.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 281 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20060306/95044d5b/attachment.vcf>