[OSGeo-Board] board.osgeo.org visibility

[Daniel Brookshier]

I have an easy option. Because as far as I know, archives are not  
easily edited for content, lets keep this list private and use it for  
sensitive matters in the future. We can create a public list that is  
fresh and unadulterated. We can then open up the project. Rich should  
look at what is in the files and docs to make sure it is also good to  
go before I throw the switch.

Daniel Brookshier
Community Manager
214-207-6614

On Mar 6, 2006, at 10:06 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:

>
>
> Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>> Rich Steele wrote:
>>> I agree with Chris. We may want to mine the existing list to make  
>>> sure there are not things that should be kept private.  The vote  
>>> and tiebreak is a good example.  I also agree there should be a  
>>> private list, the use of which should be discouraged, but which  
>>> can be used for sensitive topics (as well as for legal advice  
>>> that is only for board eyes).
>> Rich / Chris,
>> I am happy to have the detailed voting information and our tie  
>> breaking
>> deliberations stripped out of the archive for privacies sake.  I  
>> think
>> someone ought to review the archive to see that anything else  
>> sensitive
>> is removed as well though I can't think of anything off hand.
> Nothing from me.  I had actually always thought it was public  
> visible, and the voting stuff actually raised a red flag for me,  
> though I then realized that it was in fact private.  Ideally we  
> could archive that stuff in board-private, but that might be asking  
> too much.
>
> Chris
>
>> Best regards,
>
> -- 
> Chris Holmes
> The Open Planning Project
> thoughts at: http://cholmes.wordpress.com
> <cholmes.vcf>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: board-unsubscribe at board.osgeo.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: board-help at board.osgeo.org