[Board] Advisory Board?
Michael P. Gerlek
mpg at flaxen.com
Mon Sep 10 08:27:30 PDT 2012
After thinking about this over the weekend, I'm -0 on the Advisory Board idea. It may be that it could be defined in such a way that I'd support it, but (1) I don't see the our governance Board being as effective as it should and (2) we have a community of the best and brightest of the open source geo world already. Until we get better at leveraging those two, and until OSGeo has a better handle our our mission and direction, I'm reluctant to go further.
I do recognize that there are some high-level, influential people out there who could help us, and I'd like to see that happen eventually, but I'm just not sure I'm ready for that yet.
-mpg
On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com> wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
> I fully agree with your pragmatic concerns.
>
> For the record, I am neither in favor of nor against an advisory board at this point. I don't see a need for it myself, but am not against someone else spending their time/energy making a case for it and defining how it would work either. My suggestion about the sponsors was simply to make sure they are considered *if* we go that route.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 12-09-08 2:41 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> I'm hesitant of setting up an "advisory board" due to the practicalities
>> associated with it.
>> In particular:
>>
>> 1. How would you determine who is on the board? Will we allow anyone who
>> volunteers to be part of the board? If so, we already have such a board
>> - it is called the OSGeo discuss list.
>>
>> 2. If we decide to be selective about the "Advisory Board" then we could
>> point to the existing OSGeo Board, or maybe existing OSGeo Charter
>> members, or event "OSGeo Advocates". But I'm concerned about the level
>> of engagement that you would get from each of these groups.
>>
>> 3. And what would be the level of time commitment expected from the
>> "Advisory Board"? To be valuable, there will likely be a reasonable time
>> commitment. And the experienced OSGeo members we have access to already
>> have competing time commitments.
>>
>> 4. Alternatively, if we want non-trivial time commitments from
>> experienced OSGeo members, then payment should be considered. This would
>> align with OSGeo acting as a recruitment company, which I think is
>> beyond the mandate of OSGeo. Instead, I believe such recruitment should
>> be done outside of OSGeo.
>>
>> Hence, I suggest that we avoid setting up an "advisory board" and make
>> use of our existing communities instead.
>>
>> On 08/09/12 07:11, Daniel Morissette wrote:
>>> Just another tought, but if we consider setting up an advisory board,
>>> we may also want to think about how we could involve our sponsors more
>>> in this as well. If they are ready to put some of their money in
>>> OSGeo, then they are probably good candidates for an advisory board too.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On 12-09-06 12:05 PM, Mark Lucas wrote:
>>>> I recently visited Digital Globe in Longmont Colorado and reconnected
>>>> with their team. They are in the process of acquiring GeoEye and they
>>>> are the predominant collector of commercial satellite imagery in the
>>>> world. With the combine assets they sit on, if memory serves me
>>>> correctly, something like 12 Billion square miles of collected imagery.
>>>> Their worldview sensor will introduce high resolution spectral bands.
>>>>
>>>> I was in several discussions about open source software, OSGeo, and
>>>> remote sensing in general. They are interested in potentially providing
>>>> imagery data sets for testing, evaluation, and to derive new application
>>>> areas. It was clear that they would like to engage with us to make some
>>>> of these efforts happen
>>>>
>>>> I believe Dr Walter Scott is in the process of joining the OGC board.
>>>> I've know him for over a decade, here is a writeup:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.afcea.org/events/stratcom/11/documents/scottwalter.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Should we consider establishing an OSGeo Advisory board made up of
>>>> leaders in the industry that might help advance our cause?
>>>>
>>>> Like to hear what everyone thinks of the idea.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Board mailing list
>>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Morissette
> http://www.mapgears.com/
> Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
More information about the Board
mailing list