[Board] Fwd: FOSS4G 2014 RFP Vote

Daniel Morissette dmorissette at mapgears.com
Mon Jul 22 04:59:56 PDT 2013


On 13-07-22 7:55 AM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
> I get your point, but personally I would be less worried about this in
> the current situation, given the fact that the conference committee has
> gone through this process, and gotten into a tie-break, indicating that
> both proposals match the Evaluation Criteria of the RFP pretty well.
>

You're right. I thought about that as well after sending my previous reply.


> I'd expect a brief summary by the bid teams (double-checked by the
> conference committee on facts), based on which people can vote, or
> something similar. We can't expect all charter members to read the
> proposals IMHO.
>

Sounds like a good way forward given the fact that both bids seem to 
meet the evaluation criteria as stated above.

Let's see what others think, but I'd be supportive of this idea...


-- 
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000




More information about the Board mailing list