[Board] How about freezing agendas 1 week prior to the meeting?

Jody Garnett jody.garnett at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 09:25:35 PDT 2015


The other way to approach it is new items are added to the end of the
agenda, and if we time box the meeting we may (or may not) get to them in
the available time.

I think we fell down on it this time with a few last moment additions
appearing earlier in our agenda?

Other ideas mark topics for discussion as "(discussion)" in the agenda and
time-box it. I expect this would provide an initial discussion, with
further details going to the email list.

--
Jody Garnett

On 15 October 2015 at 13:00, Sanghee Shin <shshin at gaia3d.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It was my first time attending board meeting and I think we should do
> something to improve meeting efficiency. It was too short to discuss
> agendas and make decisions at the same time. I feel I've got too short
> time/background infos to think over the items/agendas that was added at the
> last minute.
>
> So I’d like to propose to freeze meeting agenda at least 1 week prior to
> the meeting.
>
> Explanation/discussion about agenda should be done before the meeting and
> we’d better focus on decision itself at the meeting.
>
> Any idea on this?
>
> Best regards,
>
> 신상희
> ---
> Shin, Sanghee
> Gaia3D, Inc. - The GeoSpatial Company
> http://www.gaia3d.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20151016/d136dbb9/attachment.html>


More information about the Board mailing list