[Board] [FOSS4G-2019 RFP] Re: f2f meeting follow up

Tue Aug 22 05:47:27 PDT 2017

This is obviously an important thread. The Boston Team will look forward to
watching it further develop on the Conference Dev list and look forward to
sharing our experiences and perspectives. Indeed we dealt deeply with
costs, diversity, workshop equipment, date of conference as well as other
topics not on this list such as AV and videotaping. I have attached a PDF
of the briefing that we gave to the Board during the F2F which touches on
some of our thoughts/findings as we headed into the conference on Monday
evening. And indeed, we will also develop and share an after-action report
with our biggest lessons learned *after *now having run the conference.

On the AGM, we agree that scheduling it to not run alongside the regular
program makes sense. And, in hindsight, I think we would have followed
Maxi's suggestion and provided a room for the AGM during one of the 90
minute lunch break that were provided on Weds, or Thurs. It is not
realistic to have the AGM run as the only session during the program (you
would give up too many speaking slots as in our case we ran 11 rooms
concurrently), but there should be time during lunch, or before, or after
the main sessions on one of the three days.

Sincerely,

MT

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Venka <venka.osgeo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for summarizing the range of listed accommodations
> at FOSS4G-Conferences.
>
> I agree that increasing the range of options available to
> be a very helpful for conference goers. Perhaps, this
> could be mentioned in the FOSS4G-2019 RFP.
>
> I am also forwarding this mail to the conference committee ML.
> Changed the subject of the mail.
>
> Best
>
> Venka
>
> On 2017/08/22 10:15, Michael Smith wrote:
>
> This is what I came up with:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vuzmHAxO-
> JInB7WGIm8S5C4ca1ezoaKigDN8
> vWDu3hs/edit?usp=sharing
>
> I also included the range for each conference based on the listed
> accommodations from the conference sites. Some of the years didn't have a
> conference hotel or a low cost option. I think this is something that
> should
> go into the RFP, that a range needs to be made available for the
> conference
> and listed on the web site. Having listed hostels or university dorm
> accommodations  I think goes a long way. We don't need to be making the
> conference overall cheaper, we need to increase the range of options
> available to the conference goers (IMHO).
>
> Mike
>
> ----
> Michael Smith
> OSGeo Foundation Treasurer
> treasurer at osgeo.org
>
>
> From:  Board <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
> <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Jody Garnett
> <jody.garnett at gmail.com> <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
> Date:  Monday, August 21, 2017 at 7:34 PM
> To:  Michael Smith <michael.smith at erdc.dren.mil>
> <michael.smith at erdc.dren.mil>
> Cc:  "board at lists.osgeo.org" <board at lists.osgeo.org>
> <board at lists.osgeo.org> <board at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject:  Re: [Board] [Non-DoD Source] Re:  f2f meeting follow up
>
> No worries Michael, I am not sure exactly when the deadline we were given
> falls (not sure we took mins for the AGM).
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 21 August 2017 at 15:06, Smith, Michael ERDC-RDE-CRREL-NH CIV
> <Michael.Smith at erdc.dren.mil> <Michael.Smith at erdc.dren.mil> wrote:
>
> This is on my list to do this week. I was going to get a list of FOSS4G
> locations and the US State Dept per diem values as an index to costs at
> each
> location. I'll convert it all to 2017 dollars. Note that this will be an
> index, not exact costs.
>
> Mike
>
> Michael Smith
> OSGeo Foundation Treasurer
> treasurer at osgeo.org
>
> From: Board <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
> <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Jody Garnett
> <jody.garnett at gmail.com> <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, August 21, 2017 at 2:23 PM
> To: "board at lists.osgeo.org" <board at lists.osgeo.org>
> <board at lists.osgeo.org> <board at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Board] f2f meeting follow up
> Resent-From: Michael Smith <michael.smith at usace.army.mil>
> <michael.smith at usace.army.mil>
>
> I saw this thread get into the details of the RFP - for that we have
> volunteers on the conference committee. My goal as a board member is to
> work
> on strategy, as the conference committee knows best about the RFP wording
> and process.
>
> Q: Based on the affordability report, and resulting discussion, did we as
> the board have any direction to ask the conference committee to steer in?
>
> My own feedback:
>
> 1) I was pleasantly surprised that the ticket cost of foss4g has not
> changed
> significantly over the course of the events (indeed our most expensive
> event
> was Sydney and our cheapest Korea).
>
> I do not see any guidance to provide here (this was surprising to me).
>
> 2) Attendance continues to increase limiting appropriate venues
>
> I do not see any guidence to provide here, our community and event is
> growing. I think once we get around 3000 people we may be forced to settle
> down to consider a fixed location, but at 1000-2000 we can still move it
> around.
>
> 3) regional events are killing it
>
> I do not see any guidence to provide here, our community and events is
> growing.
> The hope is this takes some of the strain from the global event, allowing
> it
> to focus on outreach and advocacy more.
>
> 4) hard for students to attend (also journal, etc...)
>
> There was a strong hope that travel grant program could help out a lot
> here,
> that would make me sad as this was intended to work towards diversity.
>
> While there may be guidance here I am not close enough to the academic
> world
> to provide useful direction.
>
> 5) diversity
>   The original intention of the travel grant was to bring diversity
> awareness
> to our osgeo events (to apply regional events are asked to set a diversity
> target which travel grant can help towards). During foss4g I attended a
> diversity presentation that advocated creating a safe space.
>
> Guidance: Trial the use of providing a safe space in the 2018 bid.
>
> Similar recommendations online include:
> - make female speakers a priority (not just in selection, but before hand
> in
> promotion, one-on-one mentoring etc...).
> - providing child care (this helps families attend)
>
> Since these haver not been advocated by members of our community I am only
> comfortable providing guidance on providing a safe space. Perhaps some of
> these ideas can be tried out at regional conferences first.
>
> 6) time of year
>
> The events have moved from September/October to August placing it in the
> way
> of European holidays. With the bulk of our contributors in Europe this has
> affected how many of our contributors can attend.
>
> Guidance: Request September / October event (to maximize contributors who
> can attend).
>
> I understand next years event has plans to turn this into a holiday for
> families which is a cunning plan.
>
> 7) travel / accommodation
>
> I would like to avoid prime tourist season to avoid asking attendees pay
> high airfair and accommodation costs. We did not have the number in the
> affordability report to back this up (but Michael Smith was going to look
> things up).
>
> Guidance: Request September / October event (to avoid peak tourist
> season).
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>

-- 
*Michael Terner*
*Executive Vice President*
617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main
Applied Geographics, Inc.
24 School Street, Suite 500
Boston, MA 02108
www.AppGeo.com

-- 
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or legally 
privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient or otherwise 
authorized to receive this message, you should not use, copy, distribute, 
disclose or take any action based on the information contained in this 
e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message and material 
in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete 
this message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics, Inc. (AppGeo).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20170822/3fc4db5f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OSGeo Board Briefing.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 691554 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20170822/3fc4db5f/attachment.pdf>