[Conference-resources] Request to create CfP of academic track and workshop for FOSS4G 2026 Hiroshima

[Jin Igarashi]

Hi Vicky san,

I am sorry, I did not notice your email and sent another email to you about
2 hours ago. It was weird I did not receive any notification for your
responded email to me...

Actually, I created academic one and workshop one under OSGEO JP...
[image: image.png]

I just started writing my first draft of CfP for workshop.
https://talks.osgeo.org/orga/event/foss4g-jp-2026-workshops/

If FOSS4G 2026 CfP needs to be created under FOSS4G International
organizer, please do create three of them under FOSS4G organizer team.

You can delete existing general one and academic one, but don't delete
workshop one from OSGeo JP (I will transfer texts to new one for workshop).

Thanks
Jin Igarashi


2025年9月17日(水) 10:10 Vicky Vergara <vicky at erosion.dev>:

> To keep consistency I will do the change for the general trac
> Add the teams with members from OSGEO.JP organization
> I'll do that tomorrow first thing, I just need a reply from Igarashi San
> about that he is aware of the change, Before I actually do the change.
>
> Regards
> Vicky
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 3:00 PM Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Sept 2025 at 19:10, Vicky Vergara <vicky at erosion.dev> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Igarashi San
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Vicky, Igarashi San
>>
>>
>>> I added you as a team member of FOSS4G Japan admin.
>>>
>>> I think something is wrong.
>>>
>>> Luca: please correct me if I am wrong:
>>>
>>> The FOSS4G international organizer is supposed to be FOSS4G not OSGeo.JP
>>> I created the workshop and academic trac instinctively using the FOSS4G
>>> organizer.
>>> So right now there are:
>>> The general trac with  OSGeo.JP as organizer   <- I think this should be
>>> FOSS4G as organizer
>>> The academic trac with  FOSS4G as organizer
>>> The workshop trac with  FOSS4G as organizer
>>>
>>> The registered reviewers for the international event are registered
>>> under FOSS4G organizer
>>> That is the main reason I think it is not OSGEO.JP the organizer.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, we created different teams under the FOSS4G organizer, probably we
>> should continue like that but for me it could be also good to use the
>> OSGeo.JP organizer, I don't see big differences. I probably made a mistake
>> when I created the general track but I'm not able to change the organizer.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> This is the history of the event of the general trac:
>>> [image: image.png]
>>> I can see that it has not been worked out yet.
>>>
>>> And of course the recently created ones have not been modified yet
>>> either.
>>>
>>> It's a good time to fix whatever needs to be fixed.
>>>
>>> I Just need Luca's confirmation about which to fix.
>>> About the fix:
>>> I could not find that pretalx can change organizer, so I think the way
>>> to standardize the organizer is:
>>> Create the event(s) with the correct organizer  and remove the one(s)
>>> with the wrong organizer
>>> If the organizer is FOSS4G then create a new team under that organizer
>>> that has all the OSGEO.JP team members
>>>
>>
>>
>>> I need Luca to confirm.
>>>
>>> Yeah in the previous years were like that.
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Vicky
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> ciao
>> Luca
>>
>> www.lucadelu.org
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference-resources/attachments/20250917/3050f710/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 56960 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference-resources/attachments/20250917/3050f710/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 151935 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference-resources/attachments/20250917/3050f710/attachment-0003.png>