[OSGeo-Conf] Conference policy

[Helena Mitasova]

>
> +1  from me on allowing for third party OSGeo branded events, with  
> detailed
> policy yet to be defined

Helena

>
On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:

> Daniel Ames wrote:
>> +1 for Dave Patton's request for a definition of "3rd party OSGeo  
>> branded event"
>
>
> Dave / Daniel,
>
> I believe the question is, are we open to the idea of events
> (conferences, training) operated by a 3rd party (not under direct  
> OSGeo
> supervision), potentially operated for a profit by the third party but
> presented using the OSGeo name, logo, etc.
>
> If we are not open to this, then there is no need to go into detailed
> policy proposals.
>
> > So, I would ask that all committee members[1] publicly vote FOR (+1)
> > or AGAINST (-1) third party OSGeo branded events.
>
> I'm +1 on allowing for third party OSGeo branded events, with detailed
> policy yet to be defined.
>
> Best regards,
> -- 
> --------------------------------------- 
> +--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev