[OSGeo-Conf] Re: [mapserver-dev] GeoServer superseeding MapServer
in Europe?
Seven (aka Arnulf)
seven at arnulf.us
Wed Jul 7 16:03:36 EDT 2010
The concept of having one talk per presenter makes a lot of sense. It
will be appreciated by the presenters as well as the audience because
they receive a well prepared talk. And the presenters do not get over
stressed.
Not so sure about the restriction of one presentation per organizations.
If an org can afford to send several presenters, good for them, good for
us. If they mess up it will show.
But this does not solve the problem that currently one has to submit
several talks in the hope that one "will make it". I have no good idea
how to deal with that.
Best regards,
Arnulf
PS:
Germany : Spain
0 : 1
Too bad. :-)
On 07/07/2010 09:21 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> People annoyed their talk wasn't selected: News at 11.
>
> 120 slots, 360 talks. I thought the LOC did as well as they could
> integrating the community scores (which were heavily biased towards
> technology talks on "popular things") with their own judgements, given
> that they were going to have to reject 2 of every 3 submissions.
>
> We could institute an only-one-talk-per-person policy, it would
> certainly help revenues (right Cameron? :) There will still be
> interesting talks rejected and people annoyed though. I think further
> discriminating (as a policy) based on organizational affiliation is a
> bridge too far though, if I may put a self-interested oar in.
>
> P.
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Daniel Morissette
> <dmorissette at mapgears.com> wrote:
>> <off_topic>
>> Since you opened the FOSS4G selection process can of worms, I am of the
>> opinion that the current FOSS4G selection process has some problems and
>> needs some work, as demonstrated by the fact that several
>> people/organizations got multiple talks, while at the same time several
>> others with less prominent names got turned down with very interesting
>> proposals. I got comments from several people about that after the
>> FOSS4G selection results were announced.
>> </off_topic>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
--
Exploring Space, Time and Mind
http://arnulf.us
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list