[OSGeo-Conf] Proposed text for an OSGeo Code of Conduct

Thu Jan 22 09:13:04 PST 2015

Cameron-

while
- my earlier concerns about a CoC remain unchanged
- and this text still is logically flawed and also otherwise not always sound
and complete
- and this text is based on views of one particular culture, not all
...it is much more concise, and overall I'm glad to see some kind of institution
cited now; I cannot find any official status, finding something from UN might
have more authority.

But again, please don't see this as a nodding; in general, a CoC for me will be
a strong hint that I am not taken serious as a responsible person, so a strong
reason to likely not go there. If you claim that not me, but others may act
irresponsibly then it is even more so a reason for me not to go to such a
strange event. Just like I am cautious in a place where "wearing knives and guns
is strictly prohibited".

-Peter

On 01/20/2015 09:35 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Peter,
> Good point: A static CoC normative document shouldn't reference a dynamic wiki
> page.
> I've found this page which is more authoritative, and should be more static:
> https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/sexual-harassment-code-practice-what-sexual-harassment
>
> I'd welcome a different reference to a definition of "Inappropriate sexualised
> environment" if someone could point us at it.
>
> On 20/01/2015 8:27 pm, Peter Baumann wrote:
>> appreciated that positive language is preferred, attempting to avoid
>> alienating like other texts do.
>>
>> hm, re geek feminism: so a normative document (CoC) is being established
>> which, for definition of a highly ambiguous and debated term relies on the
>> wiki of a group of people that is not identified further and does not have
>> any normative legitimation itself. Further, said link is subject to change
>> without notice , without clear regulations when and how (any voting there?).
>> Scary.
>>
>> -Peter
>>
>>
>> On 01/18/2015 04:33 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>> Following on from this email thread, I've drafted a proposed Code of
>>> Conduct, where I've aimed to address:
>>> * Be concise (concise words get read more)
>>> * Cover key messages
>>> * Include an escalation process for dealing with both minor and major issues
>>> * Ensure key terms are understood (in particular reference to definition of
>>> sexualised images)
>>> * Couch in positive language
>>>
>>>  *Tickbox version*:
>>> * I agree to act respectfully toward others in line with the OSGeo Code of
>>> Conduct.
>>>
>>> *OSGeo Code of Conduct*:
>>>
>>> This Code of Conduct collates the collective values adopted by our OSGeo
>>> community which baselines the behaviour we do and don’t support to ensure
>>> OSGeo is a safe and productive environment for all.
>>>
>>> We invite everyone to be respectful to all, regardless of race, gender, age,
>>> sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, national origin,
>>> ethnicity, religion, or ideas. We do not tolerate harassment of others in
>>> any form. Examples of harassment include offensive comments, verbal threats
>>> or demands, sexualized images in public spaces, intimidation, stalking,
>>> harassing photography or recording, sustained disruption of events, and
>>> unwelcome physical contact or sexual attention. [1]
>>>
>>> We expect all participants to follow the Code of Conduct when involved in
>>> OSGeo activities. This includes conferences, related social events, and
>>> online forums. Participants violating this Code of Conduct will be asked to
>>> desist and/or make amends. For gross or continual violations, offenders may
>>> be expelled from the event or forum without a refund, and/or banned from
>>> future events or other forums.
>>>
>>> Participants are encouraged to bring any concerns to the attention of event
>>> staff, the forum, forum leader, or OSGeo Board. We thank all for helping
>>> keep OSGeo welcoming, respectful, and friendly for all.
>>>
>>> [1] Examples of inappropriate sexualised environments are described here:
>>> http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Sexualized_environment
>>>
>>> On 10/01/2015 9:59 pm, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>> Looking around at various Conference "Codes of Conduct", I found the
>>>> O'Reilly definition to be eloquently worded, and less threatening to
>>>> potential attendees. (Although I still can't find a clear definition of
>>>> "sexual images".)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.oreilly.com/conferences/code-of-conduct.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Code of Conduct
>>>>
>>>> At O'Reilly, we assume that most people are intelligent and well-intended,
>>>> and we're not inclined to tell people what to do. However, we want every
>>>> O'Reilly conference to be a safe and productive environment for everyone.
>>>> To that end, this code of conduct spells out the behavior we support and
>>>> don't support at conferences. The core of our approach is this:
>>>>
>>>> We don't condone harassment or offensive behavior, at our conference venues
>>>> or anywhere. It's counter to our company values. More importantly, it's
>>>> counter to our values as human beings.
>>>>
>>>> We're voicing our strong, unequivocal support of appropriate behavior by
>>>> all participants at technical events, including all O'Reilly conferences.
>>>> We invite you to help us make each O'Reilly conference a place that is
>>>> welcoming and respectful to all participants, regardless of race, gender,
>>>> age, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, national origin,
>>>> ethnicity, or religion. So that everyone can focus on the conference
>>>> itself, and the great networking and community richness that happens when
>>>> we get together in person, we will not tolerate harassment of conference
>>>> participants in any form—in person or online.
>>>>
>>>> Examples of harassment include offensive comments, verbal threats or
>>>> demands, sexualized images in public spaces, intimidation, stalking,
>>>> harassing photography or recording, sustained disruption of sessions or
>>>> events, and unwelcome physical contact or sexual attention.
>>>>
>>>> We expect all participants—attendees, speakers, sponsors, and volunteers—to
>>>> follow the Code of Conduct during the conference. This includes
>>>> conference-related social events at off-site locations, and in related
>>>> online communities and social media. Participants asked to stop any
>>>> harassing behavior are expected to comply immediately. Conference
>>>> participants violating this Code of Conduct may be expelled from the
>>>> conference without a refund, and/or banned from future O'Reilly events, at
>>>> the discretion of O'Reilly Media.
>>>>
>>>> Please bring any concerns to the immediate attention of the event staff, or
>>>> contact our VP of Conferences, Gina Blaber at gina at oreilly.com
>>>> <mailto:gina at oreilly.com>. We thank our participants for your help in
>>>> keeping the event welcoming, respectful, and friendly to all participants.
>>>>
>>>> Read the blog post by Tim O'Reilly
>>>> <http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/07/sexual-harassment-at-technical.html> that
>>>> is the basis of our functional code of conduct for all O'Reilly conferences.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to the Lean Startup
>>>> <http://2014.leanstartup.co/code-of-conduct/> folks and the jsconf.us
>>>> <http://jsconf.com/codeofconduct.html> folks, whose Codes of Conduct
>>>> inspired some changes to our own.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Cameron Shorter,
>>> Software and Data Solutions Manager
>>> LISAsoft
>>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>>> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>>
>>> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>> -- 
>> Dr. Peter Baumann
>>  - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
>>    www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
>>    mail: p.baumann at jacobs-university.de
>>    tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
>>  - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
>>    www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann at rasdaman.com
>>    tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
>> "Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Cameron Shorter,
> Software and Data Solutions Manager
> LISAsoft
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>
> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099

-- 
Dr. Peter Baumann
 - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
   www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
   mail: p.baumann at jacobs-university.de
   tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
 - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
   www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann at rasdaman.com
   tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20150122/eacea546/attachment-0001.html>