[OSGeo-Conf] Looking for the keeper of the videos from FOSS4GNA- PDX (2014)

Jeff McKenna jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Wed Sep 23 14:20:04 PDT 2015


I agree Peter. Do you think this calls for a Board vote now, to approve 
the $200 payment from the OSGeo Treasurer?  Let me know and I will start 
that vote if needed.

-jeff



On 2015-09-23 5:51 PM, Peter Batty wrote:
> I also got an email from a friend who teaches some college courses and
> he said that he regularly makes use of this material and would really
> like to see it back online asap. I think we should seriously consider
> spending the $200 to reinstate the videos in the short term (for one
> more year) while we figure out a longer term strategy.
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Sara Safavi <sara at sarasafavi.com
> <mailto:sara at sarasafavi.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all --
>
>     I'll leave the discussion over service and account decisions to
>     others, but until the issue is settled is it possible for us to
>     retrieve old Vimeo-hosted videos (download, etc), or are they lost
>     in the ether until the account is renewed?
>
>     I ask because, coincidentally to this thread, last week I had
>     someone randomly find my presentation page from FOSS4G 2014 online.
>     They emailed to let me know the video was 404ing, and ask if by
>     chance I had another source for it (unfortunately I don't).
>     Interesting coincidence, and one that could easily affect more than
>     just myself & my PDX talk.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Sara
>
>     On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Steven Feldman
>     <shfeldman at gmail.com <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Bob
>
>         Any proposal needs to be sustainable in terms of costs and
>         volunteer time (e.g. for recording, uploading indexing etc).
>         Using multiple services is going to become very cumbersome and
>         is unlikely to be sustainable in my opinion unless the video
>         volunteers have a lot of time available.
>
>         Whilst an archive is a nice to have most of the presentations at
>         FOSS4G have a limited shelf life and we need to balance the
>         effort involved in having downloadable archives with the
>         likelihood of them ever being used and the cost of maintaining them.
>
>
>         ______
>         Steven
>
>
>>         On 21 Sep 2015, at 17:01, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
>>         <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>         <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
>>
>>         (I’m not allow to post to the CONF list, should we take this
>>         to the GENERAL list)
>>
>>         Hi Andrew,
>>
>>         But how to enforce that type of indexing/tagging operation.
>>
>>         No big argument on any of your listed capabilities below, only
>>         that they are not obviously made known by the YouTube
>>         service.  I’ve known for a long time how to download from
>>         YouTube, but it’s also not as plain of an explanation how to
>>         do so as on other sites.
>>
>>         Youtube seems to not focus on sharing the actual content, even
>>         though they may allow it.  And I’m not totally convince, after
>>         I went back and read their usage agreement again.  Still a
>>         little foggy on the reuse aspects.
>>
>>         I guess this topic would be best settled by using more than on
>>         service as a repository.  Maybe require two or three different
>>         free services to be used would be the best approach.
>>
>>         bobb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>         On Sep 21, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Andrew Ross
>>>         <andrew.ross at eclipse.org <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Dear Bob,
>>>
>>>         Some of this may be things you & others may already know.
>>>
>>>         The 15 minute limit is quickly waived if you ask for it &
>>>         even automatically in a lot of cases. Google it & you'll see
>>>         info about this.
>>>
>>>         For what it's worth, videos in YouTube can be shared
>>>         trivially via. email or social media and embedded into any
>>>         external site. This is very common and a good idea.
>>>
>>>         Additionally, in my opinion, within YouTube, it is best
>>>         practice to complete meta data for the video (talk title,
>>>         description) and tag the videos with keywords (project,
>>>         topic, technology, event, etc.) This makes them a lot easier
>>>         to find and relate to other talks shared by other people on
>>>         the same topics.
>>>
>>>         Kind regards,
>>>
>>>         A
>>>
>>>         On 21/09/15 10:53, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) wrote:
>>>>         All,
>>>>
>>>>         I like to think of these types of media as a Library of
>>>>         sorts.  And keeping them available is in the best interests
>>>>         of the community.  I have no way of calculating the benefits
>>>>         however.
>>>>
>>>>         Back to Youtube uploading complication (as I see them),
>>>>         there are defaults like 15min length, etc.  Things that the
>>>>         average joe may have problems with as far as uploading
>>>>         something. The limit can be increased, but that would
>>>>         require a media lib rain of some sort to manage the account.
>>>>
>>>>         Also, how would/could the process of indexing and binding to
>>>>         projects be best accomplished with YouTube?  Via an outside
>>>>         database, or??  I ask this now since it’s seems relevant if
>>>>         this topic leads to it’s logical conclusion of bringing
>>>>         media together into a single repository.
>>>>
>>>>         bobb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>         On Sep 19, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Fenoy Gerald
>>>>>         <gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr <mailto:gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr>>
>>>>>         wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>         David,
>>>>>         I personally feel that it is better to react than doing
>>>>>         nothing,even if,as you said "the technology is moving
>>>>>         fast", still many did so amazing work that we should keep
>>>>>         trace of it …
>>>>>
>>>>>         Nevertheless, I wonder if we can ask so much work to our so
>>>>>         loved SAC community without expensing at least a small
>>>>>         amount of money …Sorry I know I spoke too much about it
>>>>>         during this week, but still … if our president deserve to
>>>>>         have some income, SAC do deserve also !
>>>>>
>>>>>         So what will be the next move exactly, if any ?
>>>>>
>>>>>>         Le 20 sept. 2015 à 02:37, David Percy <percyd at pdx.edu
>>>>>>         <mailto:percyd at pdx.edu>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         It seems like we should have a permanent archive on our
>>>>>>         own servers, in addition to a public consumption interface
>>>>>>         like one of the services we have been discussing.
>>>>>>         This starts to get into a long term digital stewardship
>>>>>>         issue. We need to perhaps have a longer view... With
>>>>>>         content tags and stuff. But not so difficult that it
>>>>>>         becomes a task that is hard to manage, and therefore never
>>>>>>         gets done. Maybe a simple CMS... Aren't we using drupal
>>>>>>         already?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Unless we think these talks are more ephemeral due to the
>>>>>>         rapidly changing technology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         In which case we can leave the issue in the more ad hoc
>>>>>>         status that it is, and just let each LOC deal with it.
>>>>>>         Just a thought,
>>>>>>         Percy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Steven Feldman
>>>>>>         <shfeldman at gmail.com <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>         I don’t see $200/year of value in Vimeo. Surely we want
>>>>>>         our content to have the widest possible real, won’t that
>>>>>>         come through YouTube?
>>>>>>         ______
>>>>>>         Steven
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         On 19 Sep 2015, at 03:10, Andrew Ross
>>>>>>>         <andrew.ross at eclipse.org
>>>>>>>         <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         Bob,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         They are creative commons licensed and downloading is
>>>>>>>         trivial. Just landed returning from Seoul so I'll post
>>>>>>>         how to do so tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         Kind regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         A
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         On September 18, 2015 5:43:49 PM EDT, "Basques, Bob
>>>>>>>         (CI-StPaul)" <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>>>>>>         <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
>>>>>>>         Andrew,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         I have a problem with the YouTube License.  Once it’s up
>>>>>>>         there, they get to use it however they want, forever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         Also, I (still) don’t see a method for downloading
>>>>>>>         anything for saving as a local copy from YouTube (at
>>>>>>>         least not legally).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         Vimeo let’s you download/copy, and even pick who sees
>>>>>>>         your content., etc.  I’ll be the first to admit though,
>>>>>>>         that not everyone will care about this, until they do,
>>>>>>>         and then it will be too late.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         bobb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         On Sep 18, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Andrew Ross
>>>>>>>>         <andrew.ross at eclipse.org
>>>>>>>>         <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         YouTube has a much bigger community, is free, and the
>>>>>>>>         search/indexing can't be beat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         I like Vimeo, have used it a fair amount, but this is no
>>>>>>>>         contest.. YouTube wins imho.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         A
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         On September 18, 2015 11:06:30 AM PDT, Steven Feldman
>>>>>>>>         <shfeldman at gmail.com <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>         Is Vimeo preferred to YouTube? Why?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Andrew Ross post 90+ 2013 videos on YouTube at zero cost
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Regards
>>>>>>>>         Steven
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         +44 (0) 7958 924101 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207958%20924101>
>>>>>>>>         Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         On 18 Sep 2015, at 18:57, Darrell Fuhriman
>>>>>>>>         <darrell at garnix.org <mailto:darrell at garnix.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Aww crap.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Our vimeo pro account expired, and apparently that took
>>>>>>>>         some of the videos offline. I didn’t think that was
>>>>>>>>         going to happen — I guess I mis-read the consequences.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         FWIW, I think OSGeo should keep this account up and
>>>>>>>>         consolidate all the foss4g videos there (including the
>>>>>>>>         forthcoming 2015).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Board: is this a service that OSGeo is willing to pay
>>>>>>>>         for? It’s $200/year.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Darrell
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:11, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
>>>>>>>>         <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>>>>>>>         <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Edit . . .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Oops, I mean just FOSS4G.   Looks like a few of the
>>>>>>>>         videos that were on Vimeo have gone missing, besides
>>>>>>>>         mine.  At least based on the links from here:  Maybe
>>>>>>>>         something has changed on Vimeo??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         http://2014.foss4g.org/schedule/sessions/index.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         bobb
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         On Sep 18, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
>>>>>>>>         <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>>>>>>>         <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         I’m looking for the Keeper of the conference videos from
>>>>>>>>         FOSS4GNA PDX (2014)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         I see a lot of them on Vimeo, but the one I did seems to
>>>>>>>>         be missing.  It used to be there.  Unless I’m using a
>>>>>>>>         bad search filter . . .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         bobb
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         --
>>>>>>         David Percy ("Percy")
>>>>>>         -Geospatial Data Manager
>>>>>>         -Web Map Wrangler
>>>>>>         -GIS Instructor
>>>>>>         Portland State University
>>>>>>         -gisgeek.pdx.edu <http://gisgeek.pdx.edu>
>>>>>>         -geology.pdx.edu <http://geology.pdx.edu>
>>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         Gérald Fenoy
>>>>>         http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay
>>>>>
>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Conference_dev mailing list
>>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Conference_dev mailing list
>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Conference_dev mailing list
>     Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>


-- 
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/


More information about the Conference_dev mailing list