[OSGeo-Conf] Reminder - RfP 2020 final Proposals until 23rd of November

Thu Nov 22 09:55:48 PST 2018

Hi Till,

 > To all voting members - please be ready to start the questions from 
24th of November on.

Are non-voting list members allowed to ask questions?

Thanks,

Jonathan

On 2018-11-16 13:13, Till Adams wrote:
>
> Dear list, bidding teams and voring members!
>
> This is just a reminder for the voting members of CC AND for Halifax 
> and Calgary. The latter are for sure aware that their proposal is 
> expected by 23. of November last possible time [1]. As said, if you 
> finish earlier and don't want to share it yet, you can send it to me 
> and Steven in advance, we will distribute it to the voting members so 
> we can start reading earlier.
>
> To all voting members - please be ready to start the questions from 
> 24th of November on. Please also have the voting period starting on 
> December 06th (until 12th) period in mind!
>
>
> Till
>
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2020_Bid_Process
>
>
>
> Am 19.10.2018 um 21:40 schrieb Cameron Shorter:
>>
>> Voting period for FOSS4G 2020 Stage 1 is complete. We received votes 
>> from:
>>
>> Eli Adam
>> Till Adams
>> Peter Batty
>> David Bitner
>> Maria Brovelli
>> Vasile Craciunescu
>> Steven Feldman
>> Gavin Fleming
>> Darrell Fuhriman
>> Claude Philipona
>> Venkatesh Raghavan
>> Paul Ramsey
>> Sanghee Shin
>> Guido Stein
>> Michael Terner
>> Msilikale Msilanga
>> Mark Iliffle
>>
>> Unless it was lot in transit, we haven't received a vote from:
>>
>> David Fawcett
>>
>> All bar one of the voters voted as requested with a combination of 
>> +1, -1 for each city as requested.
>>
>> One voter only voted +1 for their preferred city. We counted 0 for 
>> the other cities for their vote.
>>
>> The sum of +1,0,-1 votes for each city for stage 1 is:
>>
>> Halifax: 17
>>
>> Calgary: 14
>>
>> Niagara Falls: 0
>>
>> This means that Halifax and Calgary both qualify to continue to stage 
>> 2 of the RFQ.
>>
>> I understand that Arnulf is in a poor internet connection area at the 
>> moment and I haven't been able to discuss and confirm these results 
>> with him. Hopefully he will be able to reply to confirm the result 
>> when he is back online.
>>
>> Thanks to all who participated. Congratulations and best of luck for 
>> the next stage for Halifax and Calgary.
>>
>> Niagara Falls participants, maybe you will want to find a way to 
>> become involved with the other cities.
>>
>> Warm regards, Cameron (acting as CRO)
>>
>>
>> On 18/10/18 4:52 am, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 13/10/2018 1:32 AM, Till Adams wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Voting Members of OSGeo's Conference Committee,
>>>>>
>>>>> I know, it's still some time left today, but as I am on my way 
>>>>> back from Barcelona home tomorow, I herewith send out the call on 
>>>>> voting on the three phantastic LoI's for hosting FOSS4G 2020, that 
>>>>> we received. Due to our timetable in [1] the voting period on the 
>>>>> LoI's lasts from 13th to 18th of October (last possible time).
>>>>>
>>>>> So please send your votes to:
>>>>>
>>>>> Arnulf Christl
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> Cameron Shorter
>>>>>
>>>>> The voting mechanism for stage 1 is as follows: Please vote on 
>>>>> *every single* LoI with one thumb up / thumb down each and send 
>>>>> your *three* votes to the two guys mentioned above - no of the 
>>>>> mails to me, neither CC, nor BCC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your Email can look as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> Halifax +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Calgary +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Niagara Falls +1
>>>>>
>>>>> (Of course only in case, that you vote *thumbs up* for all tree 
>>>>> ;-). BTW: A vote against can be a "-1" and this is not comparable 
>>>>> with the "-1" we know from OSgeo discussions, because here it does 
>>>>> not require any reason and/or alternative, it just means "thumb 
>>>>> down".... )
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find all relevant information on the WIKI [1]. The teams 
>>>>> that receive more +1's than -1's LoI's will pass stage 1.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope, that ALL of us will send their voting emails to Arnulf and 
>>>>> Cameron before the last possibe time on 18th of October 2018 
>>>>> passed - as said, we need a strong quorum, especially when there 
>>>>> are three teams from one country bidding for the same conference.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Till
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2020_Bid_Process
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.10.2018 um 08:36 schrieb Till Adams:
>>>>>> Dear Voting members of OSGeo's conference committee!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is just a reminder to be prepared to vote on the LoI's on the RfP 2020.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please take your time to review the LoI's [1], aks qwuestions on the
>>>>>> conference committee list until 12th of October and then please vote
>>>>>> until 18th of October. I just asked two potential CRO's to assist us for
>>>>>> the voting process, I will send their email-adresses in a seperate email
>>>>>> once they agreed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please remember that choosing the location of future FOSS4G's is your
>>>>>> only duty in the conference committee and remember that it is important
>>>>>> to have the opinion of as many of you as possible so that we can choose
>>>>>> the best location for FOSS4G 2020.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you now already know, that you will not be able to rate & vote,
>>>>>> please drop me a note ASAP. After the RfP I will ask the members, that
>>>>>> did not vote, whether they want to remain as voting members or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2020_Bid_Process
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Cameron Shorter
>>>> Technology Demystifier
>>>> Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant
>>>>
>>>> M +61 (0) 419 142 254
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Cameron Shorter
>>> Technology Demystifier
>>> Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant
>>>
>>> M +61 (0) 419 142 254
>>
>> -- 
>> Cameron Shorter
>> Technology Demystifier
>> Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant
>>
>> M +61 (0) 419 142 254
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20181122/ab150c26/attachment.html>