[OSGeo-Conf] *early* Preparation of RFP 2021

[Steven Feldman]

Maria

Unfortunately that has not happened in the past (people removing themselves). 

I believe that my proposal is a pragmatic solution to avoid the potential for the committee being inquorate.
______
Steven

Unusual maps in strange places -  mappery.org <http://mappery.org/>

Subscribe to my weekly “Maps in the Wild <http://eepurl.com/dKStT-/>” newsletter

> On 5 Jun 2019, at 10:44, Maria Antonia Brovelli <maria.brovelli at polimi.it> wrote:
> 
> Dear Stefan, Till and All
> I don't agree in changing the rules of the voting. It is the main commitment of the CC members. I prefere that people who don't have time for more than X years, ask to be removed from the Committee. 
> Best,
> Maria 
> 
> 
> 
> Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
> 
> 
> -------- Messaggio originale --------
> Da: Till Adams <adams at terrestris.de> 
> Data: 05/06/19 11:33 (GMT+01:00) 
> A: conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> Oggetto: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] *early* Preparation of RFP 2021 
> 
> Dear Steven,
> 
> thanks for correction ;-).
> 
> I agree on shorten the question period for stage 1. Nothing happened in
> the past days of this period in the past RFP's as far as I can remember.
> 
> Regarding the voting: I agree and wanted to ask the CC members anyway in
> advance. We can agree on changing the votring process in general, so
> that gets part of our rules. I will prepare a motion towards this ;-)
> 
> Till
> 
> 
> Am 05.06.19 um 11:20 schrieb Steven Feldman:
> > Great work Till, thank you
> > 
> > I think there was an error in the opening line:
> > 
> > "FOSS4G 2021 will most likely be held in North America.”
> > 
> > I have changed to:
> > 
> > "FOSS4G 2021 will most likely be held in "Other Regions”.”
> > 
> > Re *timeline*: could we bring the decision date for Stage 1 forward to
> > 14 or 15 October (shorten the question period if necessary) to give a
> > little more time for proposal writing?
> > 
> > *Voting*: Last year we had a small problem in getting sufficient votes
> > for a quorum. Should we consider a slight change given the size of the
> > committee? 
> > *Suggestion*: Before the call process commences all committee members
> > are asked to confirm that they wish to be included as voters for the
> > call, any that do not confirm would be considered recused for this vote
> > but would remain a member of the committee for future votes. That way
> > the >50% votes required for a quorum should not be a problem.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > ______
> > Steven
> > 
> > Unusual maps in strange places -  mappery.org <http://mappery.org <http://mappery.org/>>
> > 
> > Subscribe to my weekly “Maps in the Wild <http://eepurl.com/dKStT-/ <http://eepurl.com/dKStT-/>>”
> > newsletter
> > 
> >> On 5 Jun 2019, at 08:07, Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de
> >> <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de>>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear CC!
> >>
> >> I had some minutes and started an *early* prepare of the call for 2021.
> >>
> >> I added this WIKI page here:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process>
> >>
> >> Please check carefully whether the dates fit for you and of course for
> >> other errors.
> >>
> >>
> >> I will prepapre the needed documents in the next days and send them to
> >> you.
> >>
> >> Have a great day!
> >>
> >> Till
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Conference_dev mailing list
> >> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Conference_dev mailing list
> > Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
> > 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------
> 
>    SHOGun - das WebGIS Framework
> FOSS4G in Bukarest! 2019.foss4g.org
> 
> ------------------------------------------------
> Mail: adams at terrestris.de
> Tel.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 52
> 
> terrestris GmbH & Co. KG
> Kölnstraße 99
> 53111 Bonn
> 
> Tel.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 51
> Fax.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 57
> 
> Internet: www.terrestris.de <http://www.terrestris.de/>
> 
> Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6835
> 
> Komplementärin: terrestris Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH vertreten durch:
> Torsten Brassat, Marc Jansen, Hinrich Paulsen, Till Adams
> 
> Informationen über Ihre gespeicherten Daten finden Sie auf unserer
> Homepage unter folgendem Link:
> https://www.terrestris.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ <https://www.terrestris.de/datenschutzerklaerung/>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>_______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20190605/b41b69c9/attachment.html>