[OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G 2024 - BRAZIL (BRASIL)

[María Arias de Reyna]

That's the kind of info I am interested in too

El sáb., 3 jun. 2023 15:34, Vasile Craciunescu <vasile at geo-spatial.org>
escribió:

> Maybe we can ask for a simplified version of the CfP, focused more on the
> very practical details such as financial, organization, community
> involvement and less details on the social events, things to do in/around
> the city, transportation, etc. At this stage, some relevant links and
> simple statements can be enough about these chapters. If you agree, I can
> simplify the existing template to reflect this and officially invite the
> Brazilian LOC to prepare the submission.
>
> Warm regards,
> Vasile
>
>
> On 02.06.2023 21:26, María Arias de Reyna wrote:
> > You are right. I would prefer something more than the LOI, like the
> budget estimate and at least a rough description of the offering (schedule,
> logistics, prospective sponsors, ....) but not if that means waiting for
> weeks.
> >
> > Tatiana, what do you have right now? How far did you plan for this
> already?
> >
> > El vie., 2 jun. 2023 20:18, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
> <mailto:pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>> escribió:
> >
> >
> >
> >>     On Jun 1, 2023, at 7:01 AM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen at gmail.com
> <mailto:delawen at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>     Tatiana, could you prepare a proposal as requested in
> >>
> https://www.osgeo.org/wp-content/uploads/FOSS4G2023-request-for-proposal-sf-vc.pdf?
> <
> https://www.osgeo.org/wp-content/uploads/FOSS4G2023-request-for-proposal-sf-vc.pdf
> ?>
> >>     I think that could help easy any doubts we may have about hosting
> >>     FOSS4G in Belém. It is a work the organization team will have to do
> >>     anyway to host it, so it is not as if it is wasted time :)
> >
> >     Having just been talking events with some folks at pgcon, one thing
> I am reminded of is that the clock is a relentless enemy: venues will be
> booking up, vendors will be getting full, etc, etc, etc. And we’re running
> late on this years process. Is it clear what we are asking for? LOI or bid
> document? Because with the exception of things like pricing information and
> sponsor qualification, most of my core questions as a committee member get
> answered in the LOI. We should commit to turn around a review of whatever
> they submit as fast as possible.
> >
> >     P
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Conference_dev mailing list
> > Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20230603/0bba6225/attachment-0001.htm>