[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Voting for new OSGeo Charter Members openuntil 6th June 2008

[Michael P. Gerlek]

+1 from here too.  All 18 may be indeed be worthy, but moving the goal
post once the ball is in play sets a dangerous precedent.

-mpg

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
> [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of 
> Venkatesh Raghavan
> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 11:14 AM
> To: OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Voting for new OSGeo Charter 
> Members openuntil 6th June 2008
> 
> Lorenzo Becchi wrote:
> 
> > Dave Patton wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Changing the policy may be appropriate, but not
> >> during the process.
> > 
> > +1 to Dave.
> > 
> > I don't think it's a good idea to change policy now.
> 
> +1 to the above.
> 
> Venka
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>