[OSGeo-Discuss] Status of discussion regarding FOSS4G collaboration with LocationTech and POCs

Cameron Shorter cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Thu Oct 2 13:43:39 PDT 2014


I encourage all with an opinion on these topics, and especially those on 
the conference committee and board to add their votes and reasoning 
against the 6 options. Gauging opinions will of our community should be 
helpful for a board when making decisions.
Add your opinions here:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Options_2014

On 2/10/2014 2:04 am, Gert-Jan van der Weijden wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Last month there has been a lot of discussion on the subject whether 
> or not to collaborate with LocationTech in organizing the FOSS4G event 
> (and if so, under what conditions, and whats the goals of FOSS4G could 
> and should be)
>
> As  the discussion spanned over at least 3 newsgroups it was not an 
> easy one to follow. (unless you're subscribed to all OSgeo-newsgroups, 
> which I'm not)
>
> The discussion seems to be over. However 2 monuments of this 
> discussion remain
>
> 1. A wiki page at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Options_2014 
> (assembled by Cameron Shorter)
>
> 2. A google doc based survey (by Jacky Cepicky)
>
> Can someone explain to me (and others) what
>
> a) the current status of the discussion is
>
> b) where to find this status ;-)
>
> c) what the road map for this discussion is. I guess the deadline is 
> february 2015, when the Request For Proposal for 2016 is due ;-)
>
> Greetings,
>
> Gert-Jan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-- 
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20141003/96b2a251/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Discuss mailing list