[OSGeo-Discuss] CoverageJSON

[Jachym Cepicky]

Hi Bruce and Jon,

I went through the spec, and I like it in general (not that it would be so
important)

JSON usage is certainly still growing, so is size of the data. Are you guys
using the CoverageJSON in some application already? I like the metadata
verbosity, and overall readiness for international environment.

Have you been thinking about data compression too? For raster data, this
could be key issue IMHO.

good luck

Jachym

čt 11. 8. 2016 v 0:47 odesílatel Bruce Bannerman <
bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com> napsal:

> Hi,
>
> Are any projects doing any work with the emerging data format,
> CoverageJSON?
>
> See:
>
> - https://covjson.org/
>
> - https://github.com/covjson/specification/blob/master/spec.md
>
>
> I understand that this is still a work in progress, but is in a fairly
> stable state at the moment.
>
> If anyone has looked at the format in detail, what are your thoughts on
> its viability for:
>
> - data exchange; and
>
> - to underpin spatial and image analysis?
>
> Bruce
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20160817/b3ed29da/attachment-0002.html>