[OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

[Jody Garnett]

Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the GeoServer
meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does not make sense.

Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards?



--
Jody Garnett

On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>
wrote:

> Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84), please if you do
> create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on purpose, as many of these
> are not actual standards) when you are editing your project page, please
> let me know and I will edit the new standard and add a description - I have
> just went through all of these "standards" and set descriptions for each of
> the 27 "standards".  For example:
>
>   (WPS)
>
>     will now appear on the project pages as:
>
>    Web Processing Service (WPS)
>
> This consistency makes it much easier to read for new users to our site.
>
> thanks all!
>
> -jeff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170822/05622ef4/attachment.html>