[fdo-internals] FDO Incubation Progress Reports
Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca
Thu Mar 15 11:31:36 EDT 2007
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Ultimately I think it would take a substantial amount of
> layered stuff on top of the FDO C++ API to make it palatable
> to the hard core python folks
Ok, I had no idea what the effort, etc was. I agree that it's better to
concentrate on a common framework if that makes the most sense. I guess
there's a lower user base for Python than there is for .Net.
> possibly adding
> a bit of syntactic sugar which can be accomplished with SWIG.
That would be good if there are possibilities there.
> Lets not let one member of the community wag the dog,
> nor discourage the good work that has already been
I think that Sean's commentary, though generally critical, plays an
important role. Most groups can generally do things better, and having
someone calling attention to those things is a good thing. Or were you
refering to me? :)
You're right that it shouldn't discourage the good work that has been
More information about the fdo-internals